Issue 12695 - Starting soffice error: GetStorage, name: "No Content!
Summary: Starting soffice error: GetStorage, name: "No Content!
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 11777
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC All
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: thorsten.martens
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-26 20:45 UTC by pbryan
Modified: 2003-12-17 10:56 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description pbryan 2003-03-26 20:45:46 UTC
Installation of OpenOffice.org 1.1Beta works as expected. Attempting to start
OOo results in a dialog:

OpenOffice.org 1.1Beta
cannot be started due to an error in accessing the configuration data.
Please contact your system administrator.
The following internal error has occurred: GetStorage, name: "No Content!
[ OK ]

Attempts to start OOo with soffice, scalc, swriter, etc. results in the same error.

Environment:

- Linux Kernel 2.2.22
- XFree86 4.2.1
- IceWM 1.2.7
- glibc 2.3.1
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-03-27 20:56:40 UTC
I also see this.  Same glibc, same xfree, kernel 2.4.19, enlightenment
0.16.5.

I've also seen this in 644_m4 and 643 and has just put it down to
some silly environment issue.
Comment 2 pbryan 2003-03-31 19:34:52 UTC
This appears to be a duplicate of issue 11777. By exporting
STAR_OVERRIDE_DOMAINNAME=mydomain.com, OOo 1.1 Beta starts successfully.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11777 ***
Comment 3 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-21 17:23:37 UTC
This task in status 'resolved duplicated' and will be closed now.
If you don't think, that this task is fixed when the referenced bug is fixed,
please re-open this task.
If the referenced task is not fixed, please wait until it is fixed. It make no
sense to have all duplicated task open. Out of this reason this task will be
closed now.
Comment 4 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-21 17:25:21 UTC
... closed
Comment 5 utomo99 2003-12-17 07:53:19 UTC
I reopen this issue, since it look like not yet solved with issue 11777 and it
is not only with Unix but also with Windows xp. and still reported in OOo 1.1 
I hope we can investigate this. 
Maybe this issue is related to all GetStorage problem.
Issue 20003
Issue 18545
Issue 23251
Issue 23220
Issue 22253
Issue 23251
Issue 13404
Issue 21983
Issue 20705
and maybe others issue too.
Please check, and thanks

Comment 6 Olaf Felka 2003-12-17 08:56:06 UTC
of. CCed me. I don't see this as a P1 issue: it's not a general problem. Nobody
has described a way to reproduce.
Comment 7 joerg.barfurth 2003-12-17 10:48:15 UTC
This issue was closed by the original submitter as duplicate to another issue.
The fix (or workaround) for the original issue fixed the original problem.

That problem occurred in a Beta version that is long past.

utomo, how does the issue 'look not yet solved' with that fix ?

You don't state where (and how) you can reproduce the exact same problem.

Note that the 'Get Storage, name "No Content"' message may be triggered by a
number of different failures in the configuration system. In most (but
apparently not all) cases, it indicates a corrupt "Common.xcu" file.

We can only fix each case as it occurs. If the same symptom occurs due to a
different cause, that is a different bug.

In the given case, the configuration failure apparently was connected to some
problem with looking up the domainname. Unless you can reproduce this, don't
reopen this bug.

Marking as duplicate again.


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11777 ***
Comment 8 joerg.barfurth 2003-12-17 10:48:44 UTC
And closing again
Comment 9 utomo99 2003-12-17 10:56:59 UTC
utomo > Jb:
I reopen this, because in 11777 it say it is solved in 1.1. but if you look at 
my list of issue, there issue about getstorage which is reported in 1.1. 
Please check again to make sure. maybe you correct that getstorage error 
message is caused by other problem, but maybe somethings which we can track 
from list of issue I make.
Thanks