Issue 7882 - problem while changing number of columns
Summary: problem while changing number of columns
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.1
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@api
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-25 04:24 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-09-25 04:24:18 UTC
Here are  the  steps  for  replication  of  this  bug  :

First  Scenario :

1.Open  a  new  OpenOffice  word  processor document.
2.Type  and  select  one  line  of  sample  text.
3.Select ----  Format ... Columns
4.Make  the  'Columns'  value  equal  to  20  and  pres  'OK'
[Here  page  gets  divided  into  20  columns]
5.3.Select ----  Format ... Columns
6.Watch  'Columns' field : 
7. It  shows value  18  instead  of  showing  20. Try  increasing  the  value  
of field  'columns'.It  does  not  exceed  beyond  18  and  has  the  new  
changed domain [1-18]
8.This  problem  does  not  occur  if  we  select  values  less than  4 ,     
instead  of  20  in step 4.
9.Repeat steps  1  to 6  ,  with  columns  value = 4  in  step4 (instead of 20)
10.After finishing  these  steps ,  the  column  value  remains at  4 ,  but  
the  maximum  value  we  can  choose  now  is  90  and  not  99 as  previously.
So  the  domain  for  columns  value = 4   is [1-99]
11.Similarly  for  columns  input  value  more   than  3  at  step  4 ,  we  
get  a  new  domain , which  should  not  happen  and  remain  [1-99] always.

Second  scenario  :

1. Repeat  the  steps  1 to 6  from  first  scenario , with  columns  value = 
99  at  step  4.
2.later  the  columns  value  becomes equal  to  3.
3.Scroll  down  that  value to  1  in  columns  field.(Dont  press  'ok')
4.Try  increasing  that  value  again  by  scrolling.
5.After  getting  to  1 , it does  not  get  changed  thereafter.we  have  got  
the  variation from  our  first  scenario  while  testing  the  columns  field  
at upper  boumdary  value.

Thank  you.
Comment 1 ooo 2002-09-25 15:39:25 UTC
What makes you think that this is an API issue?
Comment 2 diane 2002-09-26 16:44:30 UTC
I walked thru the steps described herein using OOo 1.0.1 on Win98.

I verified that the first scenario is reproducible.  But I did notice
these squirrely traits existed only if I highlited the one line of
text before making column changes.  The issues are not reproducible if
the text is not highlighted first. The column changes occurred
smoothly and as one would expect them to when no text was hightlited
prior to changing of the column parameters.  And my system did not
like me doing this exercise with the text highlited.  My OOo stopped
responding twice during these exercises, and it actually locked up
another time.  So 3 reboots of OOo were required to get thru these steps.

The steps in the second scenario are slightly unclear.  In step 2,
"Later the columns value becomes equal to 3" was a tad ambiguous.  The
number of columns equalled 3 after selecting format, columns and
viewing the number of columns in the column setting box, after
performing step 1 with the one line of text selected.  Again with this
scenario, if the text was not selected, all changes to the column
parameters behaved as one would expect.  I did verify that all issues
were reproducible in the second scenario too, but only if the line of
text was selected prior to any format changes. 

This was an interesting little exercise.  I will let someone else
determine if OOo behaves how it is intended, or if there truly is a
bug within.  I will mark this issue as confirmed...but I am wondering
if this is acceptable OOo behavior. These steps definitely stressed
the program.
Comment 3 Unknown 2002-10-07 15:14:14 UTC
Replicated on:
Platform: PC 
Operating System: Windows 2000 NT 5.0 Version: 2190
                  WinXP, NT 5.01, Version: 2600

on a new document as well as on a saved document containing text.

I only had problems when the number of columns was increased to more 
than 15 though. Otherwise the number did not change.
Comment 4 andreas.martens 2002-10-08 15:03:10 UTC
The maximum value in the Format/Column dialog depends on the number of
columns when the dialog is called. That's funny, we will have a look
at it. 
Another remark to Format/Column: if you have no text selected, you
change the number of columns of the page (template). If you have text
selected, you'll insert a columned section. The problem seems to occur
for sections only.
Comment 5 Unknown 2002-12-01 01:33:27 UTC
Replicated on my windows xp, Writer643.
First I create a file with Writer. Then formatted it into 20 
columns. After that, I went on to “select all”, and format it into 
other number of columns. I found the choices I have only from 1 to 
18 (columns). So I tried another test that formatting a file into 4 
columns instead of 20. Then “select all” and formatted it into other 
number of columns. This time I can choose 1 to 94 (columns). Then I 
tried another test. Formatted the file into 3 columns first. Then, I 
can have 1 to 99 (columns) choices. 
Comment 6 andreas.martens 2003-01-20 20:52:31 UTC
AMA->OS: A problem of the dialog or of the core?
Comment 7 Oliver Specht 2003-01-24 12:53:43 UTC
.
Comment 8 ocke.janssen 2003-02-12 12:06:41 UTC
I'll take care for it.
Comment 9 ocke.janssen 2003-02-12 13:30:54 UTC
fixed in cws apps01
Comment 10 ocke.janssen 2003-02-19 09:17:05 UTC
reopen to send to QA
Comment 11 ocke.janssen 2003-02-19 09:19:08 UTC
fixed in apps01
Comment 12 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-20 15:36:27 UTC
SBA: The 20-column thingie is fixed in CWS Apps-01.
Comment 13 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-20 15:37:13 UTC
Verified.
Comment 14 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-23 14:31:49 UTC
SBA->OS: The 99 Column variation still gives a loop. -> Reopened and
re-targeted to OO.org 1.1 Beta2
Comment 15 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-23 14:35:13 UTC
SBA: Changed my mind. For easier task handling, I will write a new one
for the 99 Columns that cause a loop. So I leave this one as fixed.
Comment 16 stefan.baltzer 2003-02-23 15:00:32 UTC
SBA: The successor for the 99 column loop is issue 11760.
Closing this one.