Issue 7579 - Columns - Word 2k docs with columns have different pagination in OOo
Summary: Columns - Word 2k docs with columns have different pagination in OOo
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 6879
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.1
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
: 7721 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-09-08 04:56 UTC by prgmgr
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
User submitted Word doc that does not paginate properly (34.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2002-09-08 04:59 UTC, prgmgr
no flags Details
Basic Word 2K test file to demonstrate column importing issue. (22.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2002-09-08 05:00 UTC, prgmgr
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description prgmgr 2002-09-08 04:56:55 UTC
Word 2K documents with columns end up having different pagination in OOo.

I probably worded the summary wrong.

1.  In Word, create 2 columns of text that overflows onto a second
    page ( I'll attach a document ).
2.  Look at how many elements are on the second page.
3.  Load the Word doc in OOo and the second page contains less elements
    than in Word.

In this test case, the total number of elements is correct but OOo somehow
crams more elements the 2 columns than Word does.

I've attach a file sent in by Cheryl Belch.  I believe the problems she is 
experiencing is not related to section breaks as she indicated in issue 6817 ( 
I built some basic test cases and section breaks seem to import fine ) but the 
columns she is using in section 2.

At the very least, please take a look at her file to try to determine what the 
issue is with the Word doc she provided.
Comment 1 prgmgr 2002-09-08 04:59:28 UTC
Created attachment 2751 [details]
User submitted Word doc that does not paginate properly
Comment 2 prgmgr 2002-09-08 05:00:30 UTC
Created attachment 2752 [details]
Basic Word 2K test file to demonstrate column importing issue.
Comment 3 ingenstans 2002-09-08 09:14:38 UTC
Yes. I can confirm that there are errors in both docs when opened in oo1.0 as against MS 
Word 97 under Windows 2000. The "sample doc" breaks much too early on the first page in 
OO; the two column doc only has about two lines on the second page in OO where it has five 
or so in Word. 

I should be able to mark this as "new" not unconfirmed. But the 
option seems to have vanished suddenly in thte last few days.
Comment 4 Unknown 2002-09-09 01:04:23 UTC
I tried both files (Word2k, WINXP) and experienced almost the same 
what others above.

- The first file contains 2 pages in W2k and 4 pages in OO. 
- The second file includes 2 columns, and 96 rows. It has two pages, 
but on the second page there are 4 rows in W2k and 6 rows in OO. 

It seems to me a problem of the import of column starts and breaks 
rather than a pagination problem...
Comment 5 cbelch 2002-09-11 09:53:07 UTC
Hi,
Any progress on this?  All of our product Safety Data Sheets are 
produced with this column layout therefore it is important that we 
can resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Cheryl ;o)

ps. tried to change this to P1 but do not have access to do this.  
Can someone change it to P1 please!
Comment 6 prgmgr 2002-09-14 23:47:42 UTC
*** Issue 7721 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 prgmgr 2002-09-14 23:48:28 UTC
Issue 3651 may be referring to the same issue.
Comment 8 prgmgr 2002-09-15 16:47:23 UTC
Cheryl, thanks for your continued attention to this issue.

P1 priority is reserved for issues that crash OOo.

I've researched your issue more and I have found another case with 
the same behaviour as your document.

In summary, OOo current does not support sections with margins that 
are different than the main page.  Your column sections has different 
margins than the main page.

Please see issue 6879.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 6879 ***
Comment 9 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:23:42 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 10 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:29:30 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 11 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:29:45 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 12 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:40:57 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details.