Issue 67382 - IZ fails to create pages that are valid x-html strict
Summary: IZ fails to create pages that are valid x-html strict
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Bugzilla (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-14 19:22 UTC by lohmaier
Modified: 2008-11-06 21:14 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lohmaier 2006-07-14 19:22:42 UTC 
BUG/DEFECT because: 

CEE sets a default doctype of XHTML 1.0 Strict, but IZ fails to conform to it.

(OOo used to have XHTML 1.0 transitional, but during the upgrade, it was changed
to strict.

(IZ doesn't properly encode the "&" in URLs as "&")
Comment 1 stx123 2006-07-15 21:53:31 UTC 
reassign to support
Comment 2 markomlm 2006-08-01 14:43:33 UTC 
Hello @all,

the change of default doctype of XHTML 1.0 to Strict makes no sense because
our own bug reporting tool is'nt able to encode it.

The other reason is, that a lot of pages was w3c-valid (transitional) an now
there are not (strict).

Please see also http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67322

Regars Marko Moeller
Comment 3 Unknown 2006-09-19 17:18:01 UTC 
Have put in the same request to the engineers awaiting their response on this
issue .
Comment 4 Unknown 2006-09-26 13:01:13 UTC 
Stefan , 
      Due to lack of resource in this component would be possible for us to
defer the work in XHTML compliance for IZ .
Comment 5 lohmaier 2007-02-19 14:55:37 UTC 
ping?

Any status update?

If not, then Support: Please modify the default declaration in both your
templates and on the current OOo-site.
Comment 6 Unknown 2007-03-26 06:53:05 UTC 
Can you please try validating IZ page of Doc type XHTML 1.0 transitional and let
me know if it works properly. 

I still see IZ page is not properly encoded even in XHTML 1.0 transitional. 

Regards, 
Kavitha
Support Operations
Comment 7 lohmaier 2007-03-26 15:25:46 UTC 
Yes, as written in the first comment IZ doesn't encode the "&" properly.

http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
Comment 8 Unknown 2007-04-24 06:54:32 UTC 
Yes, true. Hence the request to have XHTML 1.0 transitional cannot be validated
in IZ.

Regards,
Kavitha
Comment 9 Unknown 2007-05-16 07:11:29 UTC 
st, 

Can this be marked as wontfix as this request of having XHTML compliance is not
possible to validated in current CEE. Your thoughts?

Regards, 
Kavitha
Support Operations
Comment 10 merschmann 2007-05-16 09:28:14 UTC 
Kavitha,

the problem is, that we have the "x-html strict" in the header.

This issue can be marked as fixed, if the webpages would have the "transitional"
instead of "strict" in the header. We had this some time ago..
Comment 11 lohmaier 2007-07-25 11:48:35 UTC 
You ask "Can this be flagged wontfix" when you already wrote you will not fix it?

What other status would be appropriate here?

Again: Your operators changed the doctype to strict during the upgrade. Your
product doesn't comply. It was asked to either comply to the set doctype or to
change back to transitional. You did neither, in another issue 67322 we were
told to change it back ourselves. That's what we did.

Since CollabNet is not able/willing to make IssueZilla generate xhtml-strict,
the only matching resolution is wontfix.

But again: Please change your templates accordingly, so that you won't setup
sites again that declare strict, but can not deliver strict.
Comment 12 Mechtilde 2008-11-06 21:14:08 UTC 
close the invalid issue