Issue 3393 - Regular Expressions Don't Seem to work
Summary: Regular Expressions Don't Seem to work
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Internationalization
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: All All
: P2 Trivial with 25 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: peter.junge
QA Contact: issues@l10n
URL:
Keywords:
: 2101 2323 3490 3773 4068 4073 4720 5291 5463 6003 6052 6645 6805 6806 7160 8323 9594 9854 10686 10889 10954 11963 13823 14134 14429 14572 14595 15409 39548 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 2101 2323
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-03-07 21:40 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-03-07 21:40:26 UTC
I am trying to use regular expressions in the DSUM ( and other) 
functions within the spread sheet.  Whenever I enable regular
expressions all the queries fail.  For example I have a text column
,"Name" and a numerical column "Price".  I wanted to sum all prices
which are in rows with the substring "robot" in the Name column.
If I do DSUM with regular expressions enabled, I get no matches, even
when the Regualar Expression is "robot" and I have a row which has
exactly the Name "robot" in it.  If I turn off regular expressions, then
DSUM correctly returns the sum of all rows which have exactly the
name "robot".  The regular expression search also seems to fail in the 
Search and Replace window.

  The same queries fail in both versions 641C and 638, under both
Linux and Windows98, all running on PentiumIII's.

  I'm new to IssueZilla.  I tried to find any previous Issues with the phrase
regular expression in the summary -- but found nothing.  

  I realize I may be making some kind of trivial mistake -- so I tried to use
the exmaple presented in the help docs where it says you can type all.*to find
every cell which starts with all.  This also fails.
   Am I doing something trivially wrong?

 I just guessed on the subcomponent.
Dan Graham
graham@prospero.uoregon.edu
Comment 1 peter.junge 2002-03-08 08:51:03 UTC
Hi Daniel,
I'll have a look. It would be very helpful if you could attach an
document as example.
Regards, Peter
Comment 2 ooo 2002-03-08 12:27:30 UTC
Peter, you don't need a document for that. There simply is no regular expression support in OOo yet. After querying for "regular" in issue subjects I wonder why SBA marked issues #2101 and #2323 as "resolved fixed", because the fix is only in SO6.
This is because the regular expressions are part of the i18n framework to be open-sourced, see
http://l10n.openoffice.org/i18n_framework/Open-sourcing_i18n_framework.html
Comment 3 peter.junge 2002-03-08 13:20:34 UTC
Hi Eike,
the issue is of course reproduceble because not implemented. I queried
the same issues
and wondered too. I already send Stefan a PM.
Regards, Peter
Comment 4 peter.junge 2002-03-08 13:37:35 UTC
Yet to come.
Comment 5 peter.junge 2002-03-08 13:39:01 UTC
#2101 cannot be fixed before this task is done.
Comment 6 peter.junge 2002-03-08 13:40:19 UTC
#2323 cannot be fixed before this task is done.

Comment 7 peter.junge 2002-04-05 11:28:05 UTC
*** Issue 3773 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 peter.junge 2002-04-05 11:28:17 UTC
Closed
Comment 9 peter.junge 2002-04-05 12:09:12 UTC
OOPS, Closed wrong one.
Comment 10 peter.junge 2002-04-05 12:10:04 UTC
As I said, OOPS.
Comment 11 stefan.baltzer 2002-04-10 15:20:39 UTC
*** Issue 2101 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 12 stefan.baltzer 2002-04-10 15:21:15 UTC
*** Issue 2323 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 acoffee 2002-05-04 16:56:56 UTC
Is this feature still missing from the 1.0 release? The link given by
Eike Rathke estimated a "1-2 week" period for it, while getting legal
permission. Who could update that status?
Comment 14 ooo 2002-05-06 10:16:47 UTC
Yep, the entire new i18n framework is not included in OOo1.0.
The "1-2 weeks" period refers to the time the task will take (effort),
not a due date. The document now is up-to-date.
Comment 15 ooo 2002-05-13 17:28:56 UTC
Reopening because it doesn't show up in MyIssues anymore (was set to RESOLVED 
LATER).
Comment 16 ooo 2002-05-13 17:29:43 UTC
reaccepting
Comment 17 ooo 2002-05-13 17:32:54 UTC
*** Issue 4720 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 18 ooo 2002-05-18 10:19:24 UTC
*** Issue 3490 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 19 acoffee 2002-07-31 03:05:13 UTC
Is there anything we can do about this? people to call, fax, email, or
write to? the necessary approval should come from GNU and who else?
Who could finally take the decision to take the alternate options? 
Comment 20 ooo 2002-07-31 11:09:16 UTC
@Jorge: Please be patient, things are clarified now, we'll use the
regular expressions of the C++ Boost library.
Comment 21 acoffee 2002-07-31 17:07:11 UTC
Thanks. Yes, I guess my impatience was showing through... ;) I just
needed an update, and to know whether there was something I could do.
Thanks again.
Comment 22 scarr 2002-08-01 17:26:24 UTC
*** Issue 6645 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 23 scarr 2002-08-01 17:28:51 UTC
Should the componant on this be changed to Framework?  Isn't this
going to be added to the framework for use in all programs?
Comment 24 scarr 2002-08-01 17:30:07 UTC
*** Issue 5291 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 25 scarr 2002-08-01 17:31:38 UTC
*** Issue 5463 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 26 ooo 2002-08-01 18:47:55 UTC
@Scott: framework wouldn't be the right component. The concrete
integration will happen in the i18npool module being part of the l10n
project. I therefor changed the component and QA contact entries
accordingly.
Comment 27 ooo 2002-08-01 19:05:27 UTC
...
Comment 28 scarr 2002-08-01 19:16:11 UTC
Framework was just my first thought.  The I10n project, I thought was
for language.  

I didn't want anybody to think this was just for the Spreadsheet program.

Thanks
Comment 29 frank 2002-08-07 08:37:20 UTC
*** Issue 6805 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 30 prgmgr 2002-08-19 00:44:41 UTC
*** Issue 6003 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 31 prgmgr 2002-08-19 00:45:21 UTC
*** Issue 6806 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 32 prgmgr 2002-08-21 02:38:48 UTC
*** Issue 7160 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 33 ooo 2002-10-29 15:09:32 UTC
For a latest status update see
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=439693&listName=dev
Comment 34 Oliver Specht 2002-11-28 08:45:11 UTC
*** Issue 9594 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 35 Oliver Specht 2002-11-28 10:37:51 UTC
Priority changed. 
Comment 36 frank 2002-12-05 08:48:43 UTC
*** Issue 9854 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 37 ooo 2002-12-09 14:56:18 UTC
*** Issue 4068 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 38 ooo 2003-01-09 16:01:58 UTC
retarget to OOo 1.1

back-reference to iBIS task: #104417#
Comment 39 frank 2003-01-15 13:27:43 UTC
*** Issue 10686 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 40 stefan.baltzer 2003-01-17 11:44:37 UTC
*** Issue 4073 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 41 ooo 2003-02-10 18:26:04 UTC
*** Issue 6052 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 42 Joost Andrae 2003-02-17 11:01:57 UTC
JA: re-prioritized according to new priority guide lines
Comment 43 ingenstans 2003-03-01 18:54:46 UTC
This has been retargetted to OOo 1.1 It is not in 644_m4. Can we hope 
it will be in later betas? Please, pretty please ...
Comment 44 ooo 2003-03-03 10:33:21 UTC
@Andrew:
;-) yes, it's targeted to Beta2, which is scheduled for May
Comment 45 lohmaier 2003-03-03 20:51:29 UTC
*** Issue 11963 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 46 lohmaier 2003-03-04 01:09:45 UTC
*** Issue 10954 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 47 ooo 2003-03-26 17:23:23 UTC
The most satisfying RESOLVED FIXED i ever set..
Comment 48 ingenstans 2003-03-27 11:31:14 UTC
Eike, I'm sorry; but this still isn't working for me in a freshly 
downloaded beta 1.1. I completely vaped all previous installations, as 
far as I can tell. I'm still not getting any of the wildcard and regex 
searches to work. Even the simple ones, like [:digit:] and [:alpha:] 
or .$


Comment 49 ingenstans 2003-03-27 11:37:32 UTC
I can be more precise: i OOo 1.1 beta, no searches at all work when I 
have the "regular expressions" check box ticked, including the ones 
that don't have any regexes in them (they should, of course, since a 
character matches itself). Without that box ticked, ordinary searches 
work. Wildcard ones still don't.




Windows 2000, SP3, if that makes any difference.


Comment 50 ooo 2003-03-27 11:44:36 UTC
@Andrew: Please read the target: OOo 1.1 Beta2 (2!)

And please don't mess around with the version field.
Comment 51 Unknown 2003-03-28 12:35:38 UTC
YES! ROCK! now that regex is fixed, the only thing stopping world 
domination by OOo is email merge. Unless that's been fixed..?
Comment 52 ooo 2003-04-03 15:49:23 UTC
calc06 ready for QA

@Frank: Please remember that this must be tested in the OOo
installation set built in instsetoo!
Comment 53 frank 2003-04-07 15:18:48 UTC
reset resolution to fixed
Comment 54 frank 2003-04-07 15:27:23 UTC
Peter please check it if possible.

Frank
Comment 55 peter.junge 2003-04-08 14:17:15 UTC
Integrated in CWS calc06.
Comment 56 peter.junge 2003-04-08 14:26:24 UTC
Verified in CWS calc06.
Everybody is invited to test Regular Expressions after the release of
OOo1.1Beta2.
Comment 57 peter.junge 2003-04-16 16:52:45 UTC
OK in integration build (8588) for CWS srx644_m10s1.

-> Everybody is invited to test regular expressions in OOo from next
public build in 1.1 branch on.
Comment 58 lohmaier 2003-04-27 14:17:12 UTC
*** Issue 13823 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 59 lohmaier 2003-05-10 20:21:51 UTC
*** Issue 14134 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 60 lohmaier 2003-05-16 17:57:06 UTC
*** Issue 14429 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 61 lohmaier 2003-05-18 12:38:36 UTC
*** Issue 14572 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 62 lohmaier 2003-05-18 12:43:35 UTC
*** Issue 8323 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 63 frank 2003-05-19 06:32:22 UTC
*** Issue 14595 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 64 prgmgr 2003-06-09 01:09:30 UTC
*** Issue 10889 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 65 frank 2003-06-10 07:18:23 UTC
*** Issue 15409 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 66 goldnate 2004-02-18 01:41:53 UTC
*** Issue 25630 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 67 lohmaier 2004-12-25 14:54:47 UTC
*** Issue 39548 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***