Issue 29485 - Looses Language settings.default languages for documents when document created by right clicking
Summary: Looses Language settings.default languages for documents when document create...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 40233
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.1
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial with 3 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Oliver Specht
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
: 43292 45376 59308 69256 75247 80708 88315 89622 91823 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 41707
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-05-25 14:14 UTC by stm
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description stm 2004-05-25 14:14:55 UTC 
The "Default Languages for Documents (English US)" option is normally retained.
 However, when right clicking on the desktop or in a folder to create a "New"
"OpenOffice.org 1.1.1 Text Document" and then selecting that document, the
"Default Languages for Documents (English US)" is now set to "None".

Files created with "File -> New" from within the word processor do not have this
problem.
Comment 1 jack.warchold 2004-06-03 13:24:30 UTC 
confirmed with OOo1.1.1 and 680_m41

reassigend to os
set prio to p4
set target OOo later
set status new
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2005-02-22 07:42:13 UTC 
*** Issue 43292 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 evildave 2005-02-23 21:35:44 UTC 
I believe this should be bumped up a notch or two in severity and set its target
milestone to the very next version.

One critical side-effect of this "Default Languages for Documents (English US)"
bug is that it kills Spellcheck and Autospellcheck with no information to the
user about why these CORE features no longer work.  

It should (theoretically) be a very, very easy fix, but at its present priority
(P4 - 'less annoying issues', 'OOo later'), it could be overlooked through
additional releases (it's already snuck past 1.1.4 still broken).

It's EXTREMELY annoying having spellcheck not work, and it's not a particularly
natural work-around for most users to think up on their own, and when I posted
my bug (43292), no hits on the bug database resulted from looking for 'shell'
and 'spellcheck', when I knew pretty much exactly what was going on.  How easy
is a 'work-around' if a user does not realize there is one?
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2005-03-18 10:49:51 UTC 
*** Issue 45376 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 stefan.baltzer 2006-01-04 19:01:41 UTC 
SBA: I agree with evildave that this one is worth P3. -> Changed.

Please note that IF the responsible SUN developer has a truckload of "bigger
fisch to catch"  there is always room for OOo community developers to help out
with "easy fixes".
Comment 6 stefan.baltzer 2006-01-04 19:04:03 UTC 
SBA->OS: See further description based on OOo 2.01 in duplicate issue 59308.
Comment 7 lohmaier 2006-01-04 23:04:48 UTC 
*** Issue 59308 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2006-09-05 09:17:26 UTC 
*** Issue 69256 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 michael.ruess 2007-03-09 08:12:57 UTC 
*** Issue 75247 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 michael.ruess 2007-08-15 19:27:55 UTC 
*** Issue 80708 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 michael.ruess 2008-04-16 08:03:20 UTC 
*** Issue 88315 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 12 michael.ruess 2008-05-19 12:04:46 UTC 
*** Issue 89622 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 Mathias_Bauer 2008-06-04 16:39:52 UTC 
Given the high number of duplicates we should raise the target to 3.x so that it
can get into the project reviews.
Comment 14 michael.ruess 2008-07-19 12:57:51 UTC 
*** Issue 91823 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 hagar_de_lest 2008-10-10 21:38:14 UTC 
Isn't this one a duplicate of Issue 40233 (already 5 votes)?
Comment 16 Oliver Specht 2008-10-13 08:23:29 UTC 
Duplicate of issue 40233

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 40233 ***
Comment 17 Mechtilde 2008-11-05 20:28:55 UTC 
close the duplicate