Issue 24778 - Outline numbering dialog deficiencies 3
Summary: Outline numbering dialog deficiencies 3
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-24 06:23 UTC by geofffarrell
Modified: 2013-09-14 06:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Example of outline numbering showing problem in level one paragraph alignment with other levels (5.72 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2004-01-24 06:31 UTC, geofffarrell
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description geofffarrell 2004-01-24 06:23:00 UTC
The outline numbering dialog [Format->Styles->Catalog->Numbering Styles->Modify]
is a poorly-implemented GUI.  In the Position tab, the meaning of 'Minimum
spacing numbering <-> text', is reasonably clear, but its effect is
inconsistent.  The term 'Minimum spacing', suggests that the text will begin at
the next tab stop, unless the spacing from the numbering to the first tab stop
is less than the 'Minimum spacing' specified, whereupon the text will begin
after the first tab stop, after inserting that 'Minimum spacing' between the
numbering and the text.  And that's the observed behaviour for outline numbering
at levels two and greater, but for level one, the 'Minimum spacing' is applied
regardless.  There seems to be no way of making level one text begin at the
first tab stop after the numbering.  This results in text in level one
paragraphs being badly aligned with the text of other levels and makes alignment
with these other outline levels impossible.  The behaviour of spacing after
numbering in level one paragraphs should be changed to make it consistent with
the behaviour of levels two and above.  For tidy formatting, my organisation
requires that the start of text in numbered paragraphs lines up with the
numbering of paragraphs in the next level, so this is a showstopper for me.

(Supercedes Issue 24375)
Comment 1 geofffarrell 2004-01-24 06:31:47 UTC
Created attachment 12703 [details]
Example of outline numbering showing problem in level one paragraph alignment with other levels
Comment 2 h.ilter 2004-01-26 16:48:13 UTC
Reassigned to BH
Comment 3 geofffarrell 2004-03-25 07:05:26 UTC
I've investigated this issue a bit further, and have found that Levels 2 and
higher do not, by design, avoid this problem.  My example attachment only made
them appear to do so because it had a 'Spacing to text' setting of 1.00cm, which
coincided with the next tab stop.

The behaviour seems to be that the spacing of the text after the number will be
the greater of the 'Spacing to text' (measured from the left side of the
numbering) or 'Minimum spacing number <-> text' (measured from the right side of
the numbering) settings in the Numbering Style's Position tab.  This denies the
opportunity for any paragraph that wraps around to the left margin (ie, uses a
0.00cm setting for 'Spacing to text') to have its text begin at the next tab
stop after the numbering.  This causes the errors seen in the attachment, where
the Numbering1 Numbering Style has 0.00cm for the 'Spacing to text' setting. 
The behaviour should be that the text is placed at the next tab stop following
the 'Minimum spacing number <-> text' setting.  Alternatively, this could be
fixed in a number of ways by (in preference order): displaying an 'Append tab
character' checkbox alongside the 'Spacing to text' box in the Position tab;
displaying an 'Append tab character' checkbox below the 'After' box in the
Options tab; or allowing a tab character to be put in the 'After' box (^t, for
example).  Users could then decide the exact effect they want. 
Comment 4 ace_dent 2008-05-16 02:55:42 UTC
OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised has the status 'New' pending further action, but has not
been updated within the last 4 years. Please consider re-testing with one of the
latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been addressed.
Either use the recent stable version: http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/
 
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
 
Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html
Comment 5 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 14:56:47 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements".