Issue 14633 - Report generated by autopilot doesn't respect field order if sorted
Summary: Report generated by autopilot doesn't respect field order if sorted
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: christoph.lukasiak
QA Contact: issues@dba
URL:
Keywords:
: 21508 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 20039
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-05-19 18:53 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2006-05-31 14:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-05-19 18:53:00 UTC 
Steps:

1) File | AutoPilot | Report.
2) Choose the Bibliography data source, and the Biblio table.
3) Specify Author and Title as fields, in that order.
4) Click Next 3 times to reach the sorting page.
5) Specify Sort by Title, then by Author.
6) Click Next twice.
7) Specify static report and provide a file name.
8) Click Create.

Observed: The created report has the Title column first.
Expected: The fields to appear in the order specified on the first page.
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-05-29 22:16:52 UTC 
Still a problem in 1.1 Beta2
Comment 2 Frank Schönheit 2003-05-30 08:47:28 UTC 
confirming and assigning to responsible engineer.
Comment 3 Frank Schönheit 2003-05-30 08:48:45 UTC 
Berend, this perhaps could fit into the criterions for 1.1RC (bug in a
newly introduced feature). However, this would strongly depend on the
risk. If you think that a fix for this is reasonable possible, then
please consider targeting for 1.1RC.
Comment 4 berend.cornelius 2003-06-03 09:46:39 UTC 
According to MSC this won't make it into the next release. I will fix
it for the Version after (2.0???)
Comment 5 Frank Schönheit 2003-06-03 10:44:43 UTC 
then let's target it to 2.0 :)
Comment 6 berend.cornelius 2003-08-11 11:01:36 UTC 
.
Comment 7 berend.cornelius 2003-08-25 10:29:15 UTC 
BC: I found out that the Report wizard behaves according to the MS
Access Report wizard, which was also the reason why I specified the
behavior the way it is now.  
BC->CJ: Please make a decision if the report autopilot is either
supposed to behave MS interoperable (=keep the current behavior) or to
behave logical (change the current behavior). 

IMHO we should change the current solution because we expanded the
field selection page (the first page in the autopilot) by an
additional sorting  functionality represented by "Up" and "Down"
buttons that ease possibility to exactly determine the final field order.
Comment 8 christian.jansen 2003-09-11 17:11:10 UTC 
CJ->BC: In my opinion we shall switch to the more logical solution.
Comment 9 berend.cornelius 2003-09-17 10:40:19 UTC 
BC: I will implement it within the following two months
Comment 10 diane 2003-11-06 13:18:41 UTC 
*** Issue 21508 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 hans_werner67 2004-02-02 12:25:14 UTC 
change subcomponent to 'none'
Comment 12 berend.cornelius 2004-06-07 09:45:16 UTC 
.
Comment 13 berend.cornelius 2004-06-07 09:56:57 UTC 
.
Comment 14 christoph.lukasiak 2004-06-07 13:37:29 UTC 
verified in src680m40
Comment 15 christoph.lukasiak 2004-06-16 09:25:04 UTC 
CLU->tamar: you can check your issue here:
http://download.openoffice.org/680/index.html