Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | features@sw not able to send to allfeatures | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | stx123 |
Component: | Mailing lists | Assignee: | Unknown <non-migrated> |
Status: | CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE | QA Contact: | issues@www <issues> |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P2 | CC: | issues |
Version: | current | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=116979&listName=allfeatures | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||
Issue Depends on: | 1622 | ||
Issue Blocks: |
Description
stx123
2001-09-20 17:03:55 UTC
same for features@sw http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg? msgId=118106&listName=allfeatures Seems like 1622 is not fixed. reassigning to myself Stefan, I have seen messages in the archive dating past the date this bug was filed for both features@framework and features@sw - is this still a problem? Thank you Kat I would like to wait for the next message from features@sw. There were none since ezmlm complaining for features@sw. Do you have any explanation for the problems and their solution? Stefan, Both bounce messages sited below are dated prior to 9/14 when allfeatures was recreated as a sublist, and indicate that the bounce occured because the message already had a header and suggest the recieving list (allfeatures) should be a sublist. Kat Have a look at the archiv of allfeatures. http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/SummarizeList?listName=allfeatures There you will see that there are bounce messages from features@sw at 9/24, bounce from features@graphics from 9/25, bounce from features@xml from 9/25. I would like to see allfeatures receive messages from features@sw after the bounce for sw, receive message from features@graphics after the bounce, ... The actual date for when the message was sent in each of these is prior to when the list was set up as a sublist - for the example below 9/13: --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received. Return-Path: <> Received: (qmail 7997 invoked for bounce); 13 Sep 2001 16:45:34 -0000 Date: 13 Sep 2001 16:45:34 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON@h66.sny.collab.net To: features-return-32-@xml.openoffice.org Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at h66.sny.collab.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <allfeatures@openoffice.org>: ezmlm-send: fatal: message already has a Mailing-List header (maybe I should be a sublist) (#5.7.2) I can look into retreiving the messages sent prior to the change and posting them to the archive, but this could take time depending on the resources available. Kat You're right. Thanks for being so tenacious. No, old messages don't have to be retrieved. As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved <wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified. As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved <wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified. As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved <wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved <wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. |