Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Install OOo1.1 rc1 FR localized can't install lipspa645li.so | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Installation | Reporter: | alex.thurgood |
Component: | code | Assignee: | alex.thurgood |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@installation <issues> |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues |
Version: | OOo 1.1 RC | ||
Target Milestone: | OOo 1.1 RC | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Linux, all | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
alex.thurgood
2003-07-04 14:08:11 UTC
This problem doesn't occure in the the english and french version. I would assume that your download is broken. I don't think so. Available md5sum on download from qa-test@fr.openoffice.org Linux : 1c697ff1c56e7bee4738c7a789b1e7eb OOo_1.1rc_04072003_LinuxIntel_install_fr.tar.gz MD5SUM check on file on my machine after download : 1c697ff1c56e7bee4738c7a789b1e7eb OOo_1.1rc_04072003_LinuxIntel_install_fr.tar.gz Exactly the same, so no download error. Reopening the issue, since the problem appears to lie elsewhere. Bear in mind I did not use the supplied install script, but the setup -net command from an E-term console. Alex. Please have a look. The file I've found on jumbo/OOo/temp doesn't have this problem. the version on OOo/temp is the one I uploaded... I honestly don't know what the status is as the installation sets were withdrawn and mh said he will provide new ones. Hopefully it won't be presentin that one... svesik -> mh I assume this is fixed in the new 1.1rc localised installation sets? I assume it also, reassigned to wurzel for QA. OK, well it'll have to wait until at least tomorrow, cos I've won't have broadband access until then... ;-) Alex. I have just tried installing OOo 1.1rc under SuSE 7.3. Previous versions of OO have installed without problem. The md5sum of my file is OK. I get the following : linux_harlow:/tmp/OOo_1.1rc_LinuxIntel_install # ./install --prefix=/usr/local Installation starting, please be patient ... glibc version: 2.2.4 Initializing installation program.................... /tmp/sv001.tmp/setup.bin: error while loading shared libraries: /tmp/sv001.tmp/libvcl645li.so: undefined symbol: FT_Activate_Size Installation Completed linux_harlow:/tmp/OOo_1.1rc_LinuxIntel_install # Regards, Pete. I have the same problem on RedHat 7.2. It looks like freetype >= 2.0.5 is needed for 1.1rc to run. Is this dependency a linking problem of the binaries (static/dynamic) or do we have to live with more and more dependencies in the future? Could this be a duplicate of issue 16872, which supposedly was fixed in the last couple days? I have the same problem as Peteh and Simon Matter, using Red Hat 7.2 and the English version of 1.1 RC FYI: libspa*.so contains the code for printer setup; most likely this library is not part of the setup but the user tried to print the license file and pressed the "properties" button (whatever it's called in french) of the print dialogue which would access libspa645li.so to setup the printer. There is no harm done here, the only drawback is that license won't be printable Duplex. As long as the libspa645li.so is available in the finally installed office (which it most likely is) there is no serious effect at all. The freetype problem on the other hand has nothing to do with libspa at all. The FT_ActivateSize thingy was the matter of issue 16805. this error does not occur in rc3 anymore. Closing issue. Alex Created attachment 74049 |