Issue 9953 - font embedding
Summary: font embedding
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 20370
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: christof.pintaske
QA Contact: issues@gsl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-12-09 14:07 UTC by floeff+ooo
Modified: 2004-02-20 16:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description floeff+ooo 2002-12-09 14:07:09 UTC 
I would like to see the feature of font embedding, like CorelDRAW or Word does.
If someone does not have the font you've written the document with, a (subset)
is loaded, so it is displayed correctly.
Comment 1 christof.pintaske 2002-12-09 15:45:32 UTC 
cp->ft: I would like to see that feature as well. Nevertheless is a
substantial effort. Please consider as an rfe
Comment 2 floeff+ooo 2003-03-26 17:10:14 UTC 
Any news?
Comment 3 bettina.haberer 2003-03-27 15:02:45 UTC 
Hello Florian, thank you for that issue. We are in discussion about,
it needs time.
Comment 4 eric.savary 2003-04-16 15:44:56 UTC 
Set to "NEW"
Comment 5 eric.savary 2003-04-16 15:45:41 UTC 
Set to "NEW"
Comment 6 christof.pintaske 2003-04-16 19:03:23 UTC 
cp->ft: hint, hint, hint,
Goetz might be the right owner for this
Comment 7 falko.tesch 2003-10-27 10:35:30 UTC 
FT->GW: Re-assigned to Götz.
Comment 8 goetz.wohlberg 2003-11-17 13:41:54 UTC 
GW->CP: As discussed, you have to take over and create the initial
spec. Bettina will help you with User Experience issues.
Comment 9 floeff+ooo 2004-01-30 09:51:28 UTC 
Any news? :)
Comment 10 christof.pintaske 2004-02-16 13:41:04 UTC 
please use issue 20370 for the discussion of this issue. It has been created out
of the 2.0 product concept document to deal with this.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 20370 ***
Comment 11 christof.pintaske 2004-02-20 16:44:16 UTC 
closing this one in favour of i20370