Issue 9082 - Export as XHTML produces nothing
Summary: Export as XHTML produces nothing
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 9081
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 643
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jogi
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-11-08 13:36 UTC by osavill
Modified: 2003-09-11 11:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description osavill 2002-11-08 13:36:47 UTC 
Wrote a simple document along the lines of :

text
text
   
   image
   title

text
text

Then File --> Save As, select XHTML.

No error messages are output and the file is created on disk, however it is 0 bytes long !

This appears not the be sensitive to the type of document so I have not attached one.
Comment 1 jack.warchold 2003-08-08 15:11:53 UTC 
jw: reassign to jw
could not reproduce this on OOo 1.0.1 and OOo 1.1

please tell me if this problem still occurs with the latest office 
release
else i will close this task on september 1st 2003
Comment 2 osavill 2003-08-08 15:58:45 UTC 
Export as XHTML does produce a file. However, according to Mozilla, 
it is not correctly formed. Mozilla states: ` This XML file does not 
appear to have any style information associated with it. The 
document tree is shown below.'. Does this warrant a new OR ? Should 
I cut and paste what Mozilla thinks the document tree is ?
Comment 3 Rainer Bielefeld 2003-09-01 18:59:29 UTC 
Hi Owen,

please attach a little OOo- source file and an export file.

Rainer
Comment 4 jack.warchold 2003-09-02 17:33:21 UTC 
jw: reassigned to es
Comment 5 eric.savary 2003-09-09 16:52:11 UTC 
ES->JSI: please evaluate
Comment 6 jogi 2003-09-11 11:52:16 UTC 
Yes, we had a problem with Java <-> OOo 643 but that has been solved.
And: That bug is duplicated to #9081.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 9081 ***
Comment 7 jogi 2003-09-11 11:53:05 UTC 
Closing.