Issue 90503 - Replace Issuezilla by Bugzilla 3.2
Summary: Replace Issuezilla by Bugzilla 3.2
Status: CLOSED FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Bugzilla (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: issues@www
QA Contact: issues@www
URL: http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.2/
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-08 23:33 UTC by Frédéric Buclin
Modified: 2016-04-07 08:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frédéric Buclin 2008-06-08 23:33:09 UTC
Issuezilla looks old, and some of its behaviors are bad (such as when altering
the CC list, text in tooltips when hovering URLs to other issues, and much
more). You should replace Issuezilla by the popular Bugzilla 3.0.4.

I wonder how many other big companies use Issuezilla besides you. Maybe none? :)
Comment 1 Frédéric Buclin 2008-06-08 23:35:32 UTC
/me wonders if Issuezilla is as easy to manipulate as old Bugzilla versions were.
Comment 2 Frédéric Buclin 2008-06-08 23:36:21 UTC
Yes, it is! An old bug which has been fixed for years in Bugzilla. You should
definitely upgrade.
Comment 3 Frédéric Buclin 2009-01-13 00:03:43 UTC
Any traction or willing to upgrade to Bugzilla 3.x? I wonder how many security
bugs are exploitable with Issuezilla. It shouldn't be too hard to inject some
SQL code in the DB or hack the backend code; I'm pretty sure.
Comment 4 Frédéric Buclin 2009-01-13 00:20:39 UTC
When does CollabNet plan to jump into the 21st century and replace this obsolete
Issuezilla by Bugzilla 3.2? There are currently tons of missing features, and
Issuezilla cannot work with existing external tools or bots, making it pretty
useless.

I don't see the point for OpenOffice to still use a proprietary software when
open-source provides all it needs, a.k.a Bugzilla.
Comment 5 Frédéric Buclin 2011-02-28 10:26:43 UTC
Nice, 3.2.9 is definitely much better than 2.11. :)