Issue 87019 - MacOSX : URE/SDK filenames
Summary: MacOSX : URE/SDK filenames
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: MacOSX (show other issues)
Version: DEV300m1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-14 03:53 UTC by maho.nakata
Modified: 2013-01-29 21:51 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description maho.nakata 2008-03-14 03:53:29 UTC 
Currently, for MacOSX, SDK and URE are packaged as:
OOo-SDK_3.0__install_en-US.dmg	URE_2.0__install_en-US.dmg
.
This is not correct IMHO, according to Linux's filename convention,
OOo-SDK_2.3.0rc1_LinuxIntel_install.sh and OOo-URE_1.3_linux_install_en-US.sh,
for MacOSX they should be
OOo-SDK_3.0_MacOSXIntel_install.dmg
and
OOo-URE_2.0_MacOSXIntel_install.dmg
.
Comment 1 maho.nakata 2008-03-14 03:54:16 UTC 
Of course for MacOSX PowerPC,
OOo-SDK_3.0_MacOSXPowerPC_install.dmg
and
OOo-URE_2.0_MacOSXPowerPC_install.dmg
. or something simular.
Comment 2 maho.nakata 2008-03-14 04:24:14 UTC 
Hi obr,
I think you will be interested in.
Comment 3 Stephan Bergmann 2008-03-14 09:24:55 UTC 
What puzzles *me* is the URE_2.0 part, it should rather be URE_1.3 or URE_1.4
(depending on whether you consider it post-OOo-2.3-related or
pre-OOo-3.0-related), see
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/UNO_%40since_Tags>.