Issue 8701 - crash while trying to protect a graph
Summary: crash while trying to protect a graph
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.1
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: udippel
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
: 8702 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-25 05:17 UTC by udippel
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description udippel 2002-10-25 05:17:51 UTC 
I tried to protect a graph by setting the focus on it / its surrounding cells
(Format Cells ... ->Cell Protection->Protected). The GUI (Gnome) froze and I had
to use Ctrl-Alt-Backslash to go back to the terminal.

Here is what it said: 
".....(II) R128(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
(II) R128(0): [drm] unmapping 4096 bytes of SAREA 0xd08bc000 at 0x40017000"

I restarted X (successfully) and then tried to start OpenOffice: no success.
In ps aux I found:
"udippel  10258  0.2 15.7 170660 40100 ?      S    Oct17  22:47
/usr/lib/OpenOffice.org1.0.1/program/soffice.bin
udippel  10287  0.0  0.0     0    0 ?        Z    Oct17   0:00 [soffice.bin
<defunct>]"

Any idea?
Comment 1 frank 2002-10-25 09:01:48 UTC 
*** Issue 8702 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 prgmgr 2002-10-26 03:01:21 UTC 
Uwe, thank you for using and supporting OOo.

Please attach a file that consistently reproduces this problem.

If possible, see if this issue still exists with developer build 643.

Unable to duplicate on RH 8.0, OOo 643.
Comment 3 peter.junge 2002-11-28 17:22:14 UTC 
Hi Uwe,
I do not understand too how this bug can be reproduced. Please attach
a file and decribe step-by-step what you're doing. I'm reassigning it
to you.
Peter
Comment 4 frank 2003-05-15 08:56:34 UTC 
No answer for months, so closing as invalid.

Frank
Comment 5 frank 2003-05-15 08:57:00 UTC 
closed invalid