Issue 8039 - dmake problem
Summary: dmake problem
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 7800
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 643
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: sander_traveling
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-10-03 07:22 UTC by oldfield
Modified: 2003-03-11 17:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description oldfield 2002-10-03 07:22:49 UTC 
On the compilation of dmake, the following error is shown:

+ gcc -O -o dmake objects/infer.o objects/make.o objects/stat.o objects/expand.o
objects/dmstring.o objects/hash.o objects/dag.o objects/dmake.o objects/path.o
objects/imacs.o objects/sysintf.o objects/parse.o objects/getinp.o
objects/quit.o objects/state.o objects/dmdump.o objects/macparse.o
objects/rulparse.o objects/percent.o objects/function.o objects/arlib.o
objects/dirbrk.o objects/rmprq.o objects/ruletab.o objects/runargv.o
objects/dcache.o
objects/sysintf.o: In function `Get_temp':
objects/sysintf.o(.text+0x5f8): the use of `tempnam' is dangerous, better use
`mkstemp'
+ cp unix/linux/gnu/template.mk startup/config.mk
Comment 1 thorsten.martens 2002-11-11 12:00:15 UTC 
TM->SVesik: Looks like a compilation problem to me, please have a look
...thanks !
Comment 2 oldfield 2002-12-05 08:31:41 UTC 
It's no longer a problem in the latest 643C source.
Comment 3 pavel 2002-12-31 15:18:11 UTC 
It is not true - this problem is still in the sources of OO643C as of now:

sysintf.o: In function `Get_temp':
sysintf.o(.text+0x6ec): the use of `tempnam' is dangerous, better use
`mkstemp'

On the other hand - it is a duplicate of 
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7800

Can anyone mark this bug as such, please?
Comment 4 oldfield 2003-01-02 01:55:16 UTC 
I don't know that it's still here, I just couldn't see the error
message when I compile 643c source, thanks for your info.
Comment 5 oldfield 2003-01-02 01:55:53 UTC 
Let's mark it as duplicate of 7800.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 7800 ***
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:20:56 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 7 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 17:59:40 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details.