Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 76097
German spelling - old option is useless
Last modified: 2013-02-24 20:43:14 UTC
Tools - Options - Language settings - Writing aids - Options - German spelling - old I have new orthography German dictionary installed. If I enable this option, nothing changes, Spellchecker still marks words in old orthography as incorrect and proposes me neu orthography equivalents. So this option is useless without an old orthography German dictionary installed. And if I install such a dictionary, why should I use the "German spelling - old" option?! I also suspect that this option can make OOo Writer crash. It happened to me, a crash auto-report was submitted. But still, here's the description: my dictionary.lst DICT en GB en_GB DICT en US en_US DICT de DE de_frami_neu DICT ru RU ru_RU_ie DICT ru RU ru_RU_yo HYPH en GB hyph_en_GB HYPH en US hyph_en_US HYPH de DE hyph_de_DE HYPH ru RU hyph_ru_RU THES en GB th_en_US_v2 THES en US th_en_US_v2 THES de DE th_de_DE_v2 THES ru RU th_ru_RU So I opened the .sxw file (see attachement) and checked two options: 1)Tools - Options - Language settings - Writing aids - Options - German spelling - old 2)Tools - Options - Language settings - Writing aids - Options - Check in all languages After this clicked with right mouse button on one of the underlined words (autospellcheck was on) and OOo Writer crashed. And, as I said, a crash report was autogenerated and I submitted it.
Created attachment 44213 [details] spellcheck crashed with this doucment
I can confirm that I was able to check 'Tools - Options - Language settings - Writing aids - Options - German spelling - old' without any effect and without any warnign like "no such dict. available". Help says: Alte deutsche Rechtschreibung Macht die alte deutsche Rechtschreibung zur maßgebenden Regel. Bleibt dieses Markierfeld leer, wendet OpenOffice.org für Rechtschreibprüfung und Silbentrennung die neuen Regeln an. No hint how that should work, whether a special dict. is required, ... DUP of Issue 67386 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 67386 ***
No objection, so CLOSED