Issue 70101 - Vertical equivalent to dlrarrow missing
Summary: Vertical equivalent to dlrarrow missing
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Math
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-04 15:36 UTC by krasmussen
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description krasmussen 2006-10-04 15:36:19 UTC 
I think there is a need for an upwards-downwards-facing double arrow, i. e. a
vertical equivalent to dlrarrow. I need it in situations where you would want to
place to equations on top of each other rather than next to each other, for example:
a*b=c
newline
dudarrow
newline
c over b=a

In contrast to
a*b=c dlrarrow c over b=a

It shouldn't more than taking the dlrarrow, rotating it and putting it under the
name "dudarrow" or something similar.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2006-10-05 11:02:28 UTC 
Such a symbol is not available aín any default Symbol font like OpenSymbol or
MS's Symbol. Must be created from the scratch.
Comment 2 Regina Henschel 2006-10-05 11:31:04 UTC 
You can use "Lucida Sans", which is delivered with the JRE. The symbol is U+21D5.
Comment 3 krasmussen 2006-10-05 11:36:02 UTC 
I don't think a simple arrow should be dependant on the JRE, should it? Besides,
how hard is it to create this from a rotated version of dlrarrow?