Issue 67577 - WW8: bookmark in seq fields should be imported as Reference not as number range
Summary: WW8: bookmark in seq fields should be imported as Reference not as number range
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-19 16:38 UTC by gin_mo
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
seq_bookmark_bug.doc from initial report (19.50 KB, application/msword)
2006-07-19 16:39 UTC, gin_mo 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description gin_mo 2006-07-19 16:38:01 UTC 
Observing it in 2 binary `OpenOffice.org' packages of different
versions for different processors, so specifying version and platform
this way.  Actually, the packages were these.

. `OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1.2-8.100mdk' for i586 - from mandrake
linux 10.0 system updates.

. `openoffice.org-core-1.9.104-2' for x86_64 - from fedora core 4
system.

Have documents with automatically numbered items which numbers must be
automatically duplicated elsewhere in the document.  Ensuring that
with these document elements.

. `seq' fields without BOOKMARK specified in their code.  Their values
increase as new such fields are added to document.

. Bookmarks exactly at the location of said fields.

. `seq' fields with BOOKMARK in their code being name of said
bookmarks.  Their values are the same as those of `seq' fields located
at said bookmarks.

Attaching the sample `seq_bookmark_bug.doc' using this technique.
After field update native msword displays and prints its text as:

1 1
2 2

Expecting `ooffice' to do the same.  Instead, in it document text
appears as:

1 2
3 4

That is, `seq' fields with BOOKMARK are handled just the same way as
ones without bookmarks.
Comment 1 gin_mo 2006-07-19 16:39:21 UTC 
Created attachment 37894 [details]
seq_bookmark_bug.doc from initial report
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2006-07-20 08:23:57 UTC 
MRU->MBA: an seq field from MS Word which contains a reference to a Bookmark
(like in the attachment) shouldn't be imported as number range field; the
counting will be modified by this.
The seq field having a bookmark ref is treated like a reference in MS Word and
so it should be imported into Writer. Two things must be done for this:

1. This kind of field should be imported as a reference to the bookmark with
Format "Reference" to reflect the content of the number range field.

2. Reference fields in Writer should reflect the content of a number range field
even if it is only place right before the field and not spun obver it. This is
the way MS Word handles it as to be seen from the attached doc.
Comment 3 Mathias_Bauer 2006-07-21 16:23:05 UTC 
-> HB
Comment 4 Mathias_Bauer 2008-04-25 17:20:45 UTC 
The docx import filter consumed most of our resources in the "interop" area. Due
to that we must retarget this issue. -> 3.x
Comment 5 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:17:56 UTC 
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".