Issue 61919 - Numberings loose indentation when one changes the outline numbering formating and there is a list style associated with the paragraph style.
Summary: Numberings loose indentation when one changes the outline numbering formating...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 52888
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-10 18:48 UTC by gnustavo
Modified: 2006-02-13 11:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description gnustavo 2006-02-10 18:48:25 UTC 
Create a new document using the default template.  Open the stylist and modify
the default paragraph style by associating it with the "List 1" numbering style.  
(Any other paragraph and list style should do.) Click on "Numbering On/Off" to
enable numbering and type three lines indenting the second and third ones to get
something like this:

  1 first level
    . second level
      . third level

Now, go to "Tools -> Outline Numbering...".  In the "Numbering" tab select
levels "1-10", change "Number" to "1, 2, 3, ...", and click "Ok".

The second and third lines in the document should have lost their indentation
ending looking like this:

  1 first level
  2 second level
  3 third level

This bug is particularly harmful because one cannot undo the "indentation
loosing effect" by pressing Ctrl-Z.  I've seen people been hit hard when working
in a large document, full of enumerations and itemizations, all of which lost
their indentations simultaneously with no way to revert it.
Comment 1 gnustavo 2006-02-10 18:52:14 UTC 
BTW, this issue may be related with issue #12912 which was closed due to lack of
interest, it seems.  The effects are the same although the recipe to get there
are different.
Comment 2 lars 2006-02-11 11:32:35 UTC 
I cannot reproduce this with OOo 2.0.1. What do you mean by associating it? 
Linking it with? Could you give a detailed step-by-step description? thanks
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2006-02-13 11:15:37 UTC 
This shouldn't happen anymore with OO 2.0.1. The root cause was fixed by issue
52888.
Download 2.0.1 and try out!

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 52888 ***
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2006-02-13 11:18:08 UTC 
Closing duplicate.