Issue 5461 - Install needs to check for patch 106950 for Solaris 7
Summary: Install needs to check for patch 106950 for Solaris 7
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Assignee: frank.loehmann
QA Contact: issues@installation
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-05-31 17:04 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2004-08-23 15:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-05-31 17:04:45 UTC
I could not get openoffice to install or run on my Solaris 7 systems without
patch 106950-03 or later installed. -01 does not work. Don't know if there is a
-02 or whether it works. 

Without this patch, the installation program would just abort. If I installed on
another system and nfs-mounted the directory, the user install would crash. Once
I had run the user install on another system, now just trying to run soffice
causes it to abort before the splash screen is displayed.

The installation program should check for this (and the README should make
mention of it too) in addition to the C++ runtime library patches that are
checked for.

A suitable version of this patch is included with recent recommended patch
clusters, but it's not really *necessary* to install the whole cluster, which
requires a reboot, when all you really need is one patch, which does NOT require
a reboot. In an "everyone administers his own workstation" world the patch
cluster approach is reasonable, but in large shared environments it's not.
Comment 1 Olaf Felka 2002-07-24 13:32:56 UTC
On our list on
http://staroffice-doc.germany.sun.com:8080/Teams/QA/Library/operating_systems/solaris/solarispatches.html
we have this patch as 'required'. So I think we should add this to the
readme
Comment 2 frank.loehmann 2002-11-29 07:56:49 UTC
FL->US: IS this (so called Linker-patch) patch really necessary or 
is it part of a patch we already recommend? We did not mention this 
patch in current readme.
Comment 3 ulf.stroehler 2002-11-29 10:38:49 UTC
us->of: we should consider to add the patch ID to the README if it is
mandatory.
But even more important:
when we found out that this patch is mandatory, we should also check
automatically for its presence in the Setup (as suggested by the
submitter). We already do so for all the other mandatory patch ids.
us->of: Pls. test if we can not run on Sols7 without this patch. If
so,  hand this task over to DV and FL. Thank you.
Comment 4 stefan.baltzer 2002-11-29 10:54:08 UTC
Reassigned to OF.
Comment 5 Olaf Felka 2003-03-07 14:30:34 UTC
Hi Frank,
for Solaris Sparc and Intel we have more patches on the CD as we
mention in the readme:
Solaris Intel readme:
    * for Solaris 7: 106328-08
missed patch: 106951-xx
    * for Solaris 8: 108436-01, 108774-12
missed patch: 109148-xx

Solaris Sparc readme:
    * for Solaris 7: 106327-08, 106300-09 (only 64 bit)
missed patch: 106950-xx
    * for Solaris 8: 108434-01, 108773-12, 108435-01 (only 64 bit)
missed patch: 109147-xx
Please have a look wether we will add this to SO and/or OOo readme. We
also should think about the system requirements on the OOo webpages:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs.html
Comment 6 frank.loehmann 2003-03-25 08:28:28 UTC
Change target to 1.1 Beta 2
Comment 7 frank.loehmann 2003-03-27 11:19:20 UTC
I have added them to the XML readme file, but the transformed txt
output of this file will not be displayed in setup today. Setup still
uses old static txt readme file.
Comment 8 frank.loehmann 2003-04-10 12:01:13 UTC
Verified
Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2004-08-23 15:58:12 UTC
close issue.