Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 53515
Some references to equations break when document is added to a master document
Last modified: 2007-03-22 12:07:21 UTC
The issue only show up when equations are referenced and then that document is added to a master document. To create the problem, start by making a document with equations and references to those equations. Next add it to the new master document. Now create another document with more equations. Make multiple references to those equations in this document. Add this second document to the master document. Now some of the references should point to the wrong equation.
Created attachment 28907 [details] first document
Created attachment 28908 [details] second document
Created attachment 28909 [details] master document
Reassigned to ES.
As of 10/4/05, with beta v.2, the problem with equations being linked in the master document are still occuring. The steps to create this error are outlined in the description on Thu Aug 18. -- Blair
I checked with "2.0.2 German version WIN XP: [680m5(Build9011)]" and can confirm the problem Steps to reproduce: 1. Open 'test1.odt', test and memorize the references in the "blah blah" text to the Equations 2. Do the same with 'test2.odt' 3. open 'test.odm' and check again, especially memorize "quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Equation 6 ..." "Equation 6" reference should lead to formula with the "-dB/dt" in it 4. Open 'test.odm' containing 'test1.odt' and 'test2.odt' 5. go to text "quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Equation 6 ..." and test reference in "Equation 6" Expected: it should lead to formula with the "-dB/dt" in it Actual: it leads to a formula "F=m*a" This wrong reference also was visible in a newly created master document. Until now I did not test with new "daughter documents" (but I can't believe that that might change anything). Some first tests with other (text-) references worked fine, but it seems to be too early to accept that as a final result. I will check for Duplicates later.
DUP. pls see my comments in Issue 11174 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11174 ***
Closed