Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 44930
Crash Reports crash program when sending to OOo
Last modified: 2005-05-12 11:58:02 UTC
On restart after a crash has occurred, the Crash Report tool opens up and requests to be sent to OOo. Selecting the topmost of the three options (use system settings) for sending the crash report caused program to crash. This made it almost impossible to notify OOo of defects in the program, especially as for normal non-technical users like me the bug reporting mechanism is non-trivial to learn and use. I would suggest crash reports are sent via the users default email program, and that the bug report search system is simplified considerably. All those categories are only useful if the correct information is entered, and currently it is not clear what information this should be. Most users will just ignore anything complex and you will never learn what went wrong and they will revert to using their existing software.
atr: Hi Joost, please have a look.
summarizing reporters comment: "I would suggest crash reports are sent via the users default email program, and that the bug report search system is simplified considerably." defect -> enhancement reassign
ja->swissmac: sending crash reports via email has been tested but the current solution has been proven to be far more user friendly. If you use email then there has to be an email program configured and this email program needs to have an application programming interface which doesn't change. As there are zillions of different email clients available it's not manageable to use this way. A solution by using a SOAP request sent via http is better. ja: changing issue type back to defect. ja->hro: please take a look at this issue. There seems to be a problem with internet settings on system level on Win98. I think we should have a deeper look into this area. Reassigned to you.
You need to only include one issue per issue. You have both a defect and an RFE in the same issue, as others have mentioned. This is a duplicate of 39622. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 39622 ***
closed.