Issue 43142 - Inconsistent terminology "field", "field command",
Summary: Inconsistent terminology "field", "field command",
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: ui
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: AOO PleaseHelp
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords: usability
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-19 17:46 UTC by simonbr
Modified: 2013-02-07 21:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description simonbr 2005-02-19 17:46:45 UTC
In the SDF file I find terms such as "field" and "field command" which appear to
be the same thing. 
Also, "field code" and "field name" appear to refer to the same concept.
Comment 1 stefan.baltzer 2005-02-25 17:22:27 UTC
SBA->LIZ: Please proceed.
Comment 2 e.matthis 2005-02-27 19:16:08 UTC
This inconsistency does appear to exist, in German as well. However, we have
also had negative user feedback regarding the terms "field X" in general and may
completely rename such features in Office Later because most users do not
identify with "fields". 

Holding issue.
Comment 3 e.matthis 2005-07-15 15:19:29 UTC
liz->mmp: (Transferred over from now closed as duplicate internal "reminder"
task 99895.) Maybe the results from the usability tests can help move us to a
decision. In any case, changing this term everywhere would be a huge task (365
UI strings with "field" in them). But I suggest starting with Writer strings
only and the corresponding menu entries in Impress/Draw and Calc, then moving
the fix across those apps as priority allows. I suggest leaving "field" as is in
Base and Basic because the users are used to that term there.
Comment 4 e.matthis 2005-07-15 15:20:01 UTC
reassigning
Comment 5 matthias.mueller-prove 2009-09-06 10:50:52 UTC
I am no longer officially active on OOo. Please take over.