Issue 42682 - need -lgcc_s in NetBSD for store/util
Summary: need -lgcc_s in NetBSD for store/util
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Build Tools
Classification: Code
Component: dmake (show other issues)
Version: 680m77
Hardware: All NetBSD
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: hjs
QA Contact: issues@tools
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on: 42716
Blocks: 42683
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-02-13 15:36 UTC by isah
Modified: 2005-04-21 10:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Patch for store/util/makefile.mk, necessary for NetBSD. (414 bytes, patch)
2005-02-13 15:36 UTC, isah 		no flags Details | Diff
link with g++ (697 bytes, patch)
2005-03-08 11:16 UTC, hjs 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description isah 2005-02-13 15:36:11 UTC 
The lib gcc_s is not linked with for the OS FreeBSD, NetBSD and MacOSX. However
it is actually needed for NetBSD. The following patch fixes this.
Comment 1 isah 2005-02-13 15:36:51 UTC 
Created attachment 22557 [details]
Patch for store/util/makefile.mk, necessary for NetBSD.
Comment 2 isah 2005-02-13 15:38:15 UTC 
oops, should be marked as PATCH, no DEFECT. Sorry :p
Comment 3 hjs 2005-02-14 11:41:25 UTC 
please have a look at #i42716#
Comment 4 hjs 2005-02-14 13:02:01 UTC 
btw.: i'm not even aware which platfom makefile is actually used for NetBSD and
wether your linker is gcc or g++.
Comment 5 isah 2005-02-15 20:17:45 UTC 
Platform makefile : unxbsdi2.mk 
Linker : gcc
Comment 6 hjs 2005-03-08 11:16:00 UTC 
Created attachment 23519 [details]
link with g++
Comment 7 hjs 2005-03-08 11:18:29 UTC 
ever tried if linking with g++ is an option for your platform (see patch)?
#i42682# and #i42681# issues normally handled by the linker whhen using g++.
Comment 8 flibby05 2005-03-10 12:05:28 UTC 
defect -> patch
Comment 9 hjs 2005-04-14 17:48:58 UTC 
please check if this issue is still valid
Comment 10 hjs 2005-04-21 10:50:56 UTC 
assumed fixed
Comment 11 hjs 2005-04-21 10:51:24 UTC 
closing - feel free to reopen or file a new issue if still a valid issue for
your platform