Issue 41119 - Suggestion for version numbering
Summary: Suggestion for version numbering
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-01-22 09:23 UTC by mkol
Modified: 2013-12-20 11:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: 4.1.0-dev
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mkol 2005-01-22 09:23:29 UTC
As of Now OOo uses Version numbering 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 etc. How about changing it 
to year version numbering like
OpenOffice.org 2005 (Release 1, 2, 3 etc.)
OpenOffice.org 2006 (Release 1, 2, 3 etc.)

In this way an end user will instantly come to know how old/newer a particular 
version is. Versioning like 1.1.0, 1.1.4 etc. are more appealing to 
programmers and not to end users.
Comment 1 mci 2005-02-04 14:41:25 UTC
reassigned to requirements
Comment 2 ace_dent 2008-05-16 00:21:32 UTC
OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised is currently assigned to 'Requirements' pending review, but
has not been updated within the last 3 years. Please consider re-testing with
one of the latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been
addressed. Either use the recent stable version:
http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/
 
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
 
Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html
Comment 3 Edwin Sharp 2013-12-20 11:48:43 UTC
IMHO very good suggestion.
1. We don't need a three digit version number - we had 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 but not 4.0.2, 4.0.3 etc.
2. Current version number gives an impression of lag behind competing project - AOO 4.0.1 < LO 4.1.4 
3. A year version number will give a realistic expectation to amount of updates per year.