Issue 3750 - XLib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x20b2)
Summary: XLib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x20b2)
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: thorsten.martens
QA Contact: issues@ui
URL:
Keywords:
: 3830 4159 4781 12709 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-03-31 16:16 UTC by bikehead
Modified: 2003-05-14 13:18 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description bikehead 2002-03-31 16:16:16 UTC
I downloaded 641d and I get this failure just after I make it through the setup
screen where I register my mozilla address book selecting "collected addresses".
 I can't get past this step.  If I select "personal addresses" it makes it a
little farther, claiming that the address book as been register.  However, after
putting up the initial blank document, it get an "unrecoverable error" dialog
and the console window shows an Xlib error again. I had this problem with 641c also.

I am running jdk 1.4.

I also downloaded 642 and I get the exact same behavior.

No one final important point:  neither 641d nor 642 would install out of the
box.  641d would just stop with no message.  642 stopped and complained about
not finding libstdc++-lib6.1-2.so.3.  Now I have a *lib6.1-1 and *lib6.2-2.  So
I linked my lib6.1-1 lib to lib6.1-2 and this got both installed.  I have a
number of RedHat 7.2 machines and I have to do this for each one.  On another
machines this trick got open office working.  I don't know if this is part of
the above problem.
Comment 1 stefan.baltzer 2002-04-23 13:31:05 UTC
Component changed to database access. Reassigned to Marc.
Comment 2 Unknown 2002-05-01 00:58:14 UTC
Are you by chance running OO on a different machine than your X
display?  I am, and having crashing problems at the same point in
start up (newly downloaded 641d, running on Red Hat 6.2 on x86 box, X
display on a diskless terminal).  Also, I found bug 3723 that looks to
be similar.

I've gotten several different Xlib errors running multiple times:

[esnyder@basalt program]$ ./soffice --help
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x1ab1)!

[esnyder@basalt program]$ ./soffice --help
Xlib: sequence lost (0x10008 > 0x1af3) in reply type 0xd!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x10007 > 0x1af3) in reply type 0x1!
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x7)!

[esnyder@basalt program]$ ./soffice
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x21f8)!

Comment 3 bikehead 2002-05-01 23:41:06 UTC
I have this one figured out!  I installed OpenOffice 642c/d and 1.0 as
root in expectation of sharing it with other users.  I changed to root
to do the installation.  After installing the product a number of time
in multiple configuration I have found out the following:

1. installing as a normal user into a directory owned by that user
works find.  I installed OpenOffice into my home directory and it
worked great.

2. installing as root into a directory owned by root, completed the
installation but:  when I start for the first time as root and entered
my user information and got to the address book import screen then I
will always get a async failure after the import.  Retries will always
give the same result.

3. If I install as (2) but run as a regular user then when I get to
address import the program dies with "unrecoverable error".

After tracing the program I realized that soffice tries to write to
files in <soffice root>/user.  I did 'chmod o+w,g+w user' and it
cleared up all my problems.

I have to admit to not reading the installation instructions all the
way through.  Perhaps OO 1.0 can't be installed globally under
restircted permissions?

-Brian
 
Comment 4 marc.neumann 2002-05-02 07:59:19 UTC
database acces is wrong, change it back to ui.
Comment 5 marc.neumann 2002-05-02 08:00:48 UTC
reassign
Comment 6 Unknown 2002-05-10 18:44:06 UTC
Same symptoms as Brian Anderson described.  This is a huge issue for
-net installs.

Thanks for the workaround Brian!
Comment 7 Unknown 2002-05-22 22:12:09 UTC
I just installed OO and stumbled over the same bug. It took me some  
time to locate this issue, so what about placing a note on  
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.0.0/release_notes_1.0.0.html#building  
(or where else known bugs belong to) with a big link on the download  
page and a note in the INSTALL instructions?  
  
BTW: You have to do a `chmod a+w user -R` (forgot the recursion) to  
make the workaround work (of course _you_ know but maybe not  
somebody else who's got the same problem and reads this stuff).  
  
Some more things I encountered:  
o If you start OO and cancel the import procedure, you've got two  
choices: (a) wait; OO will freeze or (b) immediately (eg while the  
timeout isn't reached yet) drag the OO window around; it will abort  
with a "Xlib: sequence lost (...) in reply type 0x0"  
o If you start OO with the workaround, go though all the surveys  
(import, registration), exit again and remove the write bit again,  
then OO will silently abort with a SIGABRT the next time you start  
it; even more frustrating ;)  
Comment 8 Unknown 2002-05-26 03:14:21 UTC
*** Issue 4781 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 stefan.baltzer 2002-06-03 11:51:58 UTC
Change component to framework. 
SBA->TM: Could be installation as well...
Reassigned to Thorsten.
Comment 10 thorsten.martens 2002-06-04 09:10:22 UTC
An installation which is going to be used by more than 1 user, should
be a net/workstation installation. A so called "fat"-installation as
described below is only a complete OO installation for 1 user in his
own directory with all the needed rights.
To avoid such problems, start the setup with "setup -net" and install
the components to a shareable folder. Afterwards log in as one of the
desired users, travel to the folder with the previously done
installation and start the setup out of this installation. Then choose
"workstation"-installation, which is much smaller than a
fat-installation. All user-specific data and folders will be installed
within the users environment (users home directory or choosen folder)
while all the other parts of the programm will still stay at the
network installation, which has been done first. So there won`t be
such problems as mentioned here. 
Comment 11 bikehead 2002-06-05 14:59:43 UTC
I tried reinstalling my OO with 'setup -net' in a public directory as
the latest comment mentions.  I then followed it up with 'setup' as a
user.  I just got a message about OO already being installed and setup
failed.

I found some instructions about net installs on OO's web site,
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/setup-linux.html, and I followed
them also.  Again with the 'already installed' message.

So my directory chmod workaround is still the only working setup for
me.  Does anyone have an idea of why the net install doesn't work for me.
Comment 12 Unknown 2002-06-19 22:36:35 UTC
I was having the same problems.  Trying to run the setup as an
unprivileged user from the net install resulted in the 'already
installed' message.  I finally discovered the .sversionrc file in my
home directory.  Removing this file allowed me to run the install from
the net install.  OpenOffice now works (except LDAP).
Comment 13 Joost Andrae 2002-11-28 13:33:04 UTC
*** Issue 3830 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 14 Joost Andrae 2002-11-28 15:59:14 UTC
*** Issue 4159 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:13:52 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 16 michael.bemmer 2003-03-12 14:32:58 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. 
Comment 17 Olaf Felka 2003-05-14 13:18:15 UTC
*** Issue 12709 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***