Issue 36788 - Frame and image import from Word result in wrong layout
Summary: Frame and image import from Word result in wrong layout
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 17567
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.3
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-07 06:41 UTC by oblong
Modified: 2004-11-25 14:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Original Word 2003 (52.00 KB, application/msword)
2004-11-07 06:42 UTC, oblong
no flags Details
PDF of how format should look (17.00 KB, application/pdf)
2004-11-07 06:42 UTC, oblong
no flags Details
As seen and saved by OOo. (30.83 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2004-11-07 06:43 UTC, oblong
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description oblong 2004-11-07 06:41:04 UTC
Original document created in Microsoft Word 2003. File|Open in OOo 1.1.3 
results in right hand frame and image in incorrect position. Frames appear on 
second page rather than first. Formatting can be recovered by changing anchor 
type (to something other than page) then dragging frames back to first page.
Comment 1 oblong 2004-11-07 06:42:06 UTC
Created attachment 19015 [details]
Original Word 2003
Comment 2 oblong 2004-11-07 06:42:43 UTC
Created attachment 19016 [details]
PDF of how format should look
Comment 3 oblong 2004-11-07 06:43:49 UTC
Created attachment 19017 [details]
As seen and saved by OOo.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2004-11-25 14:50:04 UTC
Was due to the fact, that graphics and frames were not capable of being
positioned above/below page margins (means to have a negative vertical
positioning value).
This has been adressed for OO 2.0 (see issue  17567).
Try out with current snapshot build from the download section.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 17567 ***
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2004-11-25 14:50:41 UTC
Closing duplicate.