Issue 3428 - Menus, listboxes etc. appear in first monitor (with dual headed graphics card)
Summary: Menus, listboxes etc. appear in first monitor (with dual headed graphics card)
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: ui
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial with 7 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 Beta
Assignee: stephan_schaefer
QA Contact: issues@ui
URL:
Keywords:
: 4083 4162 4170 4350 4431 4605 4897 5203 5627 5724 6115 6438 6907 7170 7295 7337 8048 8065 8251 8829 8866 8999 9064 9396 9540 9886 10046 10495 10619 10673 11340 12419 13987 15688 16331 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-03-10 20:10 UTC by alexnofftz
Modified: 2008-02-07 13:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description alexnofftz 2002-03-10 20:10:35 UTC
If using dual monitor mode in Windows, all drop down menus, listboxes, dialog boxes etc. appear on 
the primary monitor, even if you are working on the secondary one. This is very annoying, since you 
can only hardly use the mouse to navigate.
Comment 1 stephan_schaefer 2002-03-11 08:36:54 UTC
I'll take a look at it.
Comment 2 stephan_schaefer 2002-03-11 08:38:23 UTC
I'll take a look at it.
Comment 3 stephan_schaefer 2002-03-25 08:10:33 UTC
accepted...
Comment 4 stephan_schaefer 2002-04-22 08:51:04 UTC
*** Issue 4162 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 stephan_schaefer 2002-04-22 14:01:48 UTC
*** Issue 4170 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 stephan_schaefer 2002-04-23 08:02:34 UTC
*** Issue 4083 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 uhe 2002-05-03 14:06:57 UTC
*** Issue 4431 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 Frank Schönheit 2002-05-06 17:44:32 UTC
changing the title to allow people to search for "dual" before
submitting duplicates ....
Comment 9 Frank Schönheit 2002-05-07 18:09:48 UTC
*** Issue 4605 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 uhe 2002-05-15 14:23:10 UTC
*** Issue 4897 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 uhe 2002-05-23 09:31:02 UTC
*** Issue 5203 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 12 uhe 2002-06-05 08:18:32 UTC
*** Issue 5547 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 13 uhe 2002-06-07 07:33:30 UTC
*** Issue 5627 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 14 uhe 2002-06-12 08:02:16 UTC
*** Issue 5724 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 uhe 2002-07-16 08:09:29 UTC
*** Issue 6438 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 Frank Schönheit 2002-08-12 15:40:35 UTC
*** Issue 6907 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 17 stephan_schaefer 2002-08-23 16:07:29 UTC
*** Issue 7170 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 18 uhe 2002-08-30 08:55:48 UTC
*** Issue 5933 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 19 uhe 2002-08-30 08:58:12 UTC
*** Issue 7337 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 20 prgmgr 2002-09-21 19:45:57 UTC
*** Issue 4350 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 21 Unknown 2002-09-26 22:16:45 UTC
I noticed in one of the duplicate reports on this issue, someone 
mentioned not considering dual monitors into the calculations. When 
correcting this, please note that Win32 allows the user to move the 
layout of the displays, not necessarily lined up accross the top or 
with #1 on the left and #2 on the right (not to mention additional 
monitors beyond 2). The problem is not just limited to dual-head 
cards but also setups with multiple video cards.
Comment 22 prgmgr 2002-09-29 00:26:42 UTC
*** Issue 7295 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 23 prgmgr 2002-10-01 00:25:56 UTC
*** Issue 6115 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 24 prgmgr 2002-10-03 19:44:06 UTC
*** Issue 8048 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 25 Frank Schönheit 2002-10-14 15:58:50 UTC
*** Issue 8251 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 26 prgmgr 2002-11-11 18:27:27 UTC
*** Issue 8829 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 27 stephan_schaefer 2002-11-12 13:59:20 UTC
Fixed in OOo 643.
Comment 28 Frank Schönheit 2002-11-18 16:14:43 UTC
*** Issue 8866 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 29 prgmgr 2002-11-20 18:35:32 UTC
*** Issue 8999 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 30 prgmgr 2002-11-20 18:38:16 UTC
*** Issue 8065 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 31 prgmgr 2002-11-22 01:38:19 UTC
*** Issue 9064 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 32 Frank Schönheit 2002-12-02 12:46:30 UTC
*** Issue 9540 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 33 Frank Schönheit 2002-12-12 15:33:13 UTC
*** Issue 9886 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 34 Frank Schönheit 2003-02-05 16:23:47 UTC
*** Issue 10619 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 35 Frank Schönheit 2003-02-05 16:25:29 UTC
*** Issue 10673 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 36 Frank Schönheit 2003-02-26 12:39:44 UTC
*** Issue 11340 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 37 wolframgarten 2003-02-27 10:48:21 UTC
*** Issue 9396 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 38 wolframgarten 2003-02-27 10:48:36 UTC
Closed.
Comment 39 wolframgarten 2003-02-27 10:50:38 UTC
Sorry, mistake. I reopened the issue.
Comment 40 stephan_schaefer 2003-03-24 14:33:40 UTC
*** Issue 12419 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 41 Unknown 2003-04-24 17:23:12 UTC
I have the same problem with Windows 98 SE. If my secondary screen has
a larger resolution that my primary screen, the drop down menus appear
on the "invisible" area above the primary screen, so that I can only
see the lower ends of them.

In fact that is the one and only reason why I still have to work with
StarOffice 5.2 :-(
Comment 42 Frank Schönheit 2003-05-07 16:45:37 UTC
*** Issue 13987 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 43 lohmaier 2003-05-16 20:08:26 UTC
*** Issue 10495 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 44 stephan_schaefer 2003-06-17 09:24:01 UTC
*** Issue 15688 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 45 stephan_schaefer 2003-06-24 09:56:09 UTC
.
Comment 46 stephan_schaefer 2003-06-24 11:35:32 UTC
closing
Comment 47 stefan.baltzer 2003-07-04 14:20:13 UTC
*** Issue 16331 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 48 lars 2006-01-15 18:35:17 UTC
*** Issue 20227 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 49 Martin Hollmichel 2008-02-07 13:52:39 UTC
*** Issue 10046 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***