Issue 2645 - Typo in Tradition Chinese Version
Summary: Typo in Tradition Chinese Version
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Internationalization
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 643
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ulf.stroehler
QA Contact: issues@l10n
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-12-28 04:17 UTC by oldfield
Modified: 2003-05-20 16:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Sounds like the code is in a mess, I upload it as a binary file (61 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2001-12-28 04:22 UTC, oldfield 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description oldfield 2001-12-28 04:17:45 UTC 
Here's a list in Big5 encoding:

1. ?? -> ??
2. ?? -> ??
3. ?? -> ??
4. ? -> ?
5. ? -> ?
Comment 1 oldfield 2001-12-28 04:22:16 UTC 
Created attachment 852 [details]
Sounds like the code is in a mess, I upload it as a binary file
Comment 2 oldfield 2002-01-10 01:23:52 UTC 
I mean some traditional chinese translation is done wrongly with
simplified chinese characters which also appears in the traditional
chinese characters set, but they should not be used that way.

The attachment is the correct mapping.
Comment 3 Dieter.Loeschky 2002-01-11 09:12:44 UTC 
DL->Oldfield: Could you please describe where the wrong typo happens?
Is the wrong typo in a dialog or a menue or in writing text in Writer
or Impress?
Comment 4 oldfield 2002-01-14 03:17:58 UTC 
Sorry for missing this in the report.

They're in the cinema part, i.e. the descriptions which we saw during
the installation, thx.
Comment 5 oldfield 2002-02-19 04:47:11 UTC 
Oldfield -> DL: answered as above.
Comment 6 Dieter.Loeschky 2002-03-25 08:27:23 UTC 
DL->SBA: Could you please takeover?
Comment 7 stefan.baltzer 2002-05-15 11:51:40 UTC 
Oldfield, can you please verify your findings in version 641 and
comment? Thank you.
Comment 8 oldfield 2002-05-15 12:00:39 UTC 
Same for 641 or 1.0.
Comment 9 stefan.baltzer 2002-06-05 15:19:04 UTC 
Reassigned to Hasan.
SBA->HI: Please include ZL to clarify this.
Comment 10 h.ilter 2002-06-24 09:31:50 UTC 
OK
Comment 11 oldfield 2002-10-04 06:03:23 UTC 
Most are fixed in the latest 643 (SRX643_OO) except one:

優異

Thanks.
Comment 12 h.ilter 2002-12-02 11:38:25 UTC 
HI->US: Please have a look for this.
Comment 13 oldfield 2003-01-02 02:01:14 UTC 
All fixed in the latest 643C source, many thanks.
Comment 14 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-20 16:16:32 UTC 
This task is fixed or worked in OOo 1.1 beta2.
Comment 15 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-20 16:33:35 UTC 
closed ...