Issue 25562 - recht shape with glue points does not conform to DTD when saved
Summary: recht shape with glue points does not conform to DTD when saved
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: xml
Classification: Code
Component: definition (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: AOO Later
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-02-16 16:30 UTC by Frank Schönheit
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
sample document to reproduce the bug case (5.79 KB, application/x-compressed)
2004-02-16 16:38 UTC, Frank Schönheit
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frank Schönheit 2004-02-16 16:30:47 UTC
* create a new drawing
* insert a shape
* insert an arbitrary glue point
* save the document
* unzip the document file, and validate the content.xml with the DTD as
delivered with OOo in share/dtd/officedocument/1_0
=> the file is not valid relative to this DTD

I'll attach a bug doc for easier reproduction of the issue
Comment 1 Frank Schönheit 2004-02-16 16:38:09 UTC
Created attachment 13200 [details]
sample document to reproduce the bug case
Comment 2 clippka 2004-03-01 14:33:51 UTC
will be fixed for oasis format
Comment 3 clippka 2004-10-13 12:32:07 UTC
setting to prio 2 because of file format issue
Comment 4 clippka 2004-10-21 12:00:56 UTC
Christian, since you are already testing for valid files, can you please check
if this is still an issue with the relax NG?
Comment 5 christian.guenther 2004-11-17 13:06:44 UTC
clu is right. It is ok in relax NG.
But it should be fixed in 7 pp4 and the 2.0 DTD.
I send it to you because CL is on vacation.
Comment 6 michael.brauer 2004-11-17 14:50:10 UTC
MIB->CGU: As CL said, this issue is resolved in the current Relax-NG schema.
glue points are in fact missing for the OOo DTD. That's the case since OOo 1.0,
so I see no justification for resolving this issue in a OOo 1.1.x. One may fix
the OOo DTD for OOo 2.0, but that a task that has P4 or P5 rather than P2.
Comment 7 michael.brauer 2004-11-17 14:50:53 UTC
.
Comment 8 christian.guenther 2004-11-29 09:48:50 UTC
reopen to change the owner
Comment 9 christian.guenther 2004-11-29 09:49:18 UTC
Hi Jogi,

Please have a look on this Relax ng bug.
It's a file format bug and therefore a prio 2 and not a prio 4 or prio5.
What do you mean?
Comment 10 jogi 2004-11-29 10:02:00 UTC
AFAIU our definitions a wrong DTD also in OOo 2.0 is the same bug category like
a wrong RNG schema. Prio 2 and should be fixed in OOo 2.0 and also in 1.1.5. You
need a correct schema/DTD as an external XML developer.
Comment 11 christian.guenther 2004-11-29 10:12:39 UTC
According to jsi This is a prio 2 (fileformat bug) and should be fixed in
OOo1.1.5 and OOo2.0. 
I'm the same meaning. File format bugs should be fixed asap.
Comment 12 michael.brauer 2004-11-29 14:18:49 UTC
MIB: I disagree. IMHO, P2 is only a default priority for validation errors,
regardless whether the error occurs for the OOo 1.1 format where a DTD is used
or the OOo 2.0 format where Relax-NG is used. When an analysis of the issue
showed that the issue is in the schema but not in the file is itself, then the
issue is not a file format issue, and P2 is only justified if the schema error
effect many/all files.

For the validation error described in this issue, the analysis of the issue
showed that the issue is in the DTD but not in the file format itself. The
analysis showed also that the issue occured already in OOo 1.0, and does not
cause any misbehavior. Applying our priorization rules to this issue IMHO leads
to P4 or P5.
Comment 13 michael.brauer 2004-11-29 14:19:27 UTC
Flagged "Invalid"
Comment 14 thorsten.ziehm 2005-01-18 14:38:27 UTC
As discussed in the past with similar task, I set this task to P4 and 'OOo later
and set it back to mib. If it is possible to fix in OOo2.0 timeframe, than it
can be re-targeted.
=> reopen
Comment 15 thorsten.ziehm 2005-01-18 14:39:17 UTC
reassign to mib