Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 22318
Garbled printing of Labels
Last modified: 2004-06-07 09:58:13 UTC
I'm getting garbled printing of labels. The effect is very hard to describe, so I shall attach a scanned example. The nearest I can come to a description is that the alignment of lines / line parts is wrong. 1. Create new labels e.g. Avery L7165 2. Enter some text 3. Create a full page of identical labels 4. Print labels (see scanned_print.pdf) 5. Print labels through JawsPDF PDF creator (print_to_pdf.pdf) I wonder if there is a page layout issue here, as this page looks to be landscape. 6. Check page preview - seems OK (page_preview.png) 7. Export to PDF - also seems OK (export_pdf.pdf) As a workaround I'm exporting then printing PDFs, but that seems heavy! I have had this issue since OOo 1.0.0 System: PC Windows 2000 SP4 Printer: Samsung ML-4500 (Samba share on Debian Stable (Woody) Linux, using Samsung Driver on Windows) I have seen this on a directly attached Epson in the past too.
Created attachment 11128 [details] Zip file containg source labels and various outputs
cp->hdu: hmmm, works for me on Solaris. Maybe the same issue as with the two-on-one printing with glyph-substitution ? Please have a look if you can reproduce this one.
HDU->HI: please try to recreate the problem on OOo1.1. SSA thinks that PP2/aka 1.1.1 may contain a fix for this, especially the clipping problem.
I'm a new user of OpenOffice.org. I experienced the exact same problem of garbled labels. I'm running OOo 1.1.0 on a PC with Windows XP Home SP1. I have the same printer: a Samsung ML-4500 with the latest driver from the Samsung web site. - Avery 5161 labels - created a full page of identical labels - page preview looks fine (no problems) - the 'export directly to PDF' works fine (no problems) I'll try to attach a scan of the garbled output.
Created attachment 14003 [details] sample of garbled labels
OOo 1.1.1 would seem to resolve this, for me at least. How about you mgainey?
WFM with 1.1.2RC3 WIN XP: [645m44(Build8784]. I close this issue due to 'comments from gyles Tue Apr 13 03:24:06 -0700 2004' and missing reaction from "mgainey". Rainer
.