Issue 21528 - crash/lock-up bug with indenting
Summary: crash/lock-up bug with indenting
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 20942
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: frank.meies
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: crash, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-22 01:19 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
selecting the numbered list and pressing 'Increment Indent' will crash OO (14.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-10-22 01:21 UTC, Unknown
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-10-22 01:19:12 UTC
Pressing the 'Increment Indent' button while a (MSWord-created) numbered list is highlighted results in a 
lock up of OO (99% CPU usage - task must be manually killed). Example attachment forthcoming.

OO version: 1.1.0
OS: Linux; RedHat 8 based system, kernel 2.4.20, KDE3.0
Machine: 1 GHz Duron, 384MB RAM
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-10-22 01:21:22 UTC
Created attachment 10530 [details]
selecting the numbered list and pressing 'Increment Indent' will crash OO
Comment 2 utomo99 2003-10-22 08:23:18 UTC
I can Reproduce the problem on 
OpenOffice 1.1 (default Install, US), Win XP Pro Sp1. 
(And MS Office XP Sp2). 
It is real problem

After selecting some numbered list, and apply Indentation I got no
reponding 
Comment 3 h.ilter 2003-10-22 11:09:49 UTC
Reassigned to MRU
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2003-10-22 14:06:52 UTC
As workaround, highlight the mentioned paragraphs and set the indent
manually in Format.Paragraph dialog.

MRU->FME: This is the OO variant of tasks #112615 and #112753. In some
cases a loop occurs, when increase/decrease indent buttons were used
with negaive indent.
Comment 5 frank.meies 2003-10-29 11:46:14 UTC
FME: Looks like the 'increase/decrease indent' code does not consider
negative values.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 20942 ***
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2003-11-06 15:20:40 UTC
Closed as duplicate.