Issue 20489 - Q-PCD Performance-NN-01
Summary: Q-PCD Performance-NN-01
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 75349 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-30 17:26 UTC by niklas.nebel
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:13 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description niklas.nebel 2003-09-30 17:26:15 UTC 
Task tracking system for Childs
PLEASE CREATE CHILD-TASKS IN ISSUEZILLA!

Source
QA

Category
Calc

Product Requirement 
Shared Formulas

Customer Need/Problem
In order to compensate the loss of performance made by the implementation of
64000 rows in Calc and to enhance the competing applications compatibility
shared formulas are needed.

Comment
Shared formulas are an implementation detail, not a customer need!

Eng Effort
-

Eng Owner
Niklas Nebel

Product Concept
Shared formulas as a way to reduce memory usage for formulas won't be done for 'Q'.

Functional Specification
-
Comment 1 frank 2003-10-15 15:52:50 UTC 
Hi Lutz,

please decide what to do.

Frank
Comment 2 lutz.hoeger 2003-10-23 07:43:50 UTC 
added keyword Q-PCD
Comment 3 lutz.hoeger 2004-02-19 06:47:57 UTC 
Niklas, I admit that this one seems to request an implementation detail only. Is
there actually a performance loss caused by the change to 64K rows? If so can
this be compensated otherwise than implementing shared formulas? 

Are shared formulas relevant to performance only or its this also a matter of
interoperablity?

If the answer to the later question is no, and the performance loss either is
insignificant (somewhere between 0 and less than 10%) or can be compensated for
otherwise within the "Q" timeframe, I suggest to close this task as "won't fix".
Otherwise we need to discuss it again.
Comment 4 niklas.nebel 2004-05-14 14:00:57 UTC 
The change of the row limit won't affect performance (when issue 28834 is
resolved). Actually using more cells will use more memory, obviously.
Interoperability is not affected.
Comment 5 Martin Hollmichel 2004-05-28 15:01:13 UTC 
according to the announcement on releases
(http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=7503) this issue
will be re-targeted to OOo Later.
Comment 6 frank 2007-03-13 11:10:40 UTC 
*** Issue 75349 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:13:13 UTC 
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".