Issue 20420 - Revision marks disappear when new cells are added to table using tab button
Summary: Revision marks disappear when new cells are added to table using tab button
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 9665
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC5
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-30 10:34 UTC by alex.thurgood
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description alex.thurgood 2003-09-30 10:34:42 UTC
Hi all,

OOo 1.1 RC5 running on MDK Linux 9.1.
I was working on a writer document, using the revision function that lets you
display insertions, deletions and attribute changes in your document. My inserts
are chosen to be represented as blue underline, with deletions in red struck
through.

I inserted a new table 4 columns by 8 rows with the toolbar button on the
lefthand  side, the table created fine, and showed up as blue, with the entries
in the table underlined in blue as it should be.

However, when I got to the last cell in my table, I realized that I didn't have
enough, so I decided to add another row of cells, by moveing the cursor to the
last cell in the table and pressing the tab button. The cells were duly added,
but to my surprise, the table lost its "MODIFIED/INSERTED" status and was then
displayed in the normal automatic black font. If I went and then corrected
something in another cell where an entry was already present, the modifications
I made showed up in blue underlined !!!

There seems to be a flag reset when you add cells via the TAB button mechanism
that shouldn't be happening. Anyone care to take a look ?

ALex
Comment 1 mci 2003-10-08 12:32:29 UTC
set target to OOo Later
Comment 2 h.ilter 2003-10-08 14:42:14 UTC
HI->MRU: I think you have a similar one like that.
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2003-10-08 15:44:45 UTC
Describes the same as issue 9665.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 9665 ***
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2003-10-08 15:45:22 UTC
Closed as duplicate.