Issue 2032 - callout lost when convert to MS Excel
Summary: callout lost when convert to MS Excel
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 5426
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 638
Hardware: PC Windows 98
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: john.marmion
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-10-26 05:44 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
callout lost when convert to MS Excel (5.28 KB, application/octet-stream)
2001-10-26 05:45 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2001-10-26 05:44:28 UTC 
The attached spreadsheet has a callout. The callout will be lost when convert 
to MS Excel format.
Comment 1 Unknown 2001-10-26 05:45:45 UTC 
Created attachment 625 [details]
callout lost when convert to MS Excel
Comment 2 oc 2001-10-31 10:38:25 UTC 
.
Comment 3 daniel.rentz 2001-11-07 16:12:37 UTC 
.
Comment 4 farhiz 2002-10-25 08:25:10 UTC 
Yes I have this same problem too. A callout I created in 1.0.1 and 
saved in MS Office 97 format does not show when the file is opened in 
Excel 97.
Comment 5 daniel.rentz 2003-01-13 16:05:24 UTC 
target->OOo2.0
Comment 6 john.marmion 2003-01-23 16:44:24 UTC 
Looking at this now, it would be more accurate to state that the
'pointer' of the callout does not end up in the correct place. Thus
the callout is not lost but its shape gets distorted on export. This
looks like a duplicate of issue 5426. I will check with Sven first
before re-assigning this.
Comment 7 john.marmion 2003-01-23 16:50:13 UTC 
assuming ownership for now.
Comment 8 john.marmion 2003-01-23 16:53:01 UTC 
Started
Comment 9 john.marmion 2003-01-23 18:07:32 UTC 
Sven has confirmed that this is the known autoshape import problem of
issue 5426

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 5426 ***
Comment 10 john.marmion 2003-01-23 18:07:58 UTC 
Marking as closed