Issue 19537 - Continuing previous numbered lists
Summary: Continuing previous numbered lists
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC4
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-13 17:46 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
How it's done in Microsoft Word (8.21 KB, image/png)
2003-09-14 16:35 UTC, Unknown
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-09-13 17:46:03 UTC
In 1.1 RC4 if you start a numbered list e.g. 

1. Milk<enter>
2. Cheese<enter>
3. Onions<enter>
etc. 

it works fine. But if you have an existing document with some paragraphs and you
want to number them 1. 2. 3. the actual result is 1. 1. 1. 

1. (press numberedlist icon)A few lines/words of text
<a blank line>
1. (press numberedlist icon)A few lines/words of text
<a blank line>
1. (press numberedlist icon)A few lines/words of text

OO thinks that if you give a second enter to create a blank line that the next
numbered list is new and should start with 1. But in this case Especialy is you
want to number paragraphs, it should continue with the previous list, as is the
case in Microsoft Word.
Comment 1 rblackeagle 2003-09-13 22:36:56 UTC
Good point.  OOo duplicates the same problem that older versions of
Word did -- it was (and in OOo, still is) difficult to attain control
over Numbering sequences.  Would it not be useful to permit the user
to select "Start new sequence?" or "Continue old sequence?" somewhere?
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-09-14 16:35:50 UTC
Created attachment 9302 [details]
How it's done in Microsoft Word
Comment 3 Unknown 2003-09-14 16:38:07 UTC
This is exactly my point, if you can realise the above two options you
suggest it would be a nice usability improvement. 

Suggestion: From my experience with Word, it's useful to always assume
(if possible) you want to continue a sequence, most of the time you
will. if not, it's just one option you should set: "start new
sequence" so it's not much work. See the attachment I send, a
screenshot from Word My Word is in Dutch so: "Opnieuw nummeren" means
"start new sequence" and "Doorgaan met vorige lijst" means continue
old sequence.
Comment 4 mci 2003-09-16 14:12:26 UTC
reassigned to bh
set Prio to P3
Comment 5 ace_dent 2008-05-16 02:54:41 UTC
OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised has the status 'New' pending further action, but has not
been updated within the last 4 years. Please consider re-testing with one of the
latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been addressed.
Either use the recent stable version: http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/
 
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
 
Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html
Comment 6 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 15:12:14 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements".