Issue 18379 - Typos in List of Regular Expressions
Summary: Typos in List of Regular Expressions
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Online help (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC3
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@documentation
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-19 05:34 UTC by mchase
Modified: 2005-03-11 10:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Suggested replacement for "List of Regular Expressions" in Help (8.57 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-08-19 06:11 UTC, mchase
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mchase 2003-08-19 05:34:39 UTC
1. For '?', "\" is given in the first sentence where it should be "?".
2. For '\<', the example gives "\>book" instead of "\<book".
3. For all character classes ([:xxx:]), the '?' allows finding 0 or 1 
characters, not a single character.  The '?' should be removed from "Character" 
column.

Suggested rewording will be attached later today.
Comment 1 mchase 2003-08-19 06:11:48 UTC
Created attachment 8560 [details]
Suggested replacement for "List of Regular Expressions" in Help
Comment 2 rblackeagle 2003-08-19 23:57:41 UTC
Looks like a decided improvement to me.
Comment 3 derekd 2003-10-22 10:40:05 UTC
.
Comment 4 Uwe Fischer 2003-10-23 12:22:16 UTC
thank you for the doc. Will edit the source asap.
Comment 5 Uwe Fischer 2003-11-24 13:33:35 UTC
target set
Comment 6 Uwe Fischer 2004-04-22 09:22:15 UTC
edited text\shared\01\02100001.xml
Comment 7 Uwe Fischer 2004-10-21 10:26:58 UTC
.
Comment 8 Uwe Fischer 2004-10-21 10:27:38 UTC
UFI: QA, pls verify in CWS helpcontentbeta and close
Comment 9 thorsten.ziehm 2004-11-05 15:08:57 UTC
set to status 'fixed'
Comment 10 stefan.baltzer 2004-11-18 14:15:38 UTC
SBA: Verified in CWS helpcontentbeta.
Comment 11 mchase 2005-02-18 00:35:22 UTC
I'm very glad to see the changes in 1.9m77.

One minor item, the character classes ([:alpha:] and so on) don't require a '?' 
after them.  As written, the examples mean 0-1 of the class.
Comment 12 jack.warchold 2005-03-02 13:50:26 UTC
seen good in src680_m82
Comment 13 mchase 2005-03-06 01:16:38 UTC
The error I mentioned 17 February still exists in 1.9.82.  The '?' after all the 
character classes ([:digit:]?, [:digit:]?, [:digit:]?, [:space:]?, [:print:]?, 
[:cntrl:]?, [:alnum:]?, [:alpha:]?, [:lower:]?, and [:upper:]?) will confuse any 
user who isn't already familiar with regular expressions.
Comment 14 stefan.baltzer 2005-03-11 10:18:01 UTC
SBA->Mchase: The problem you described on Feb 17th does not belong here at all
after the initially described typos were fixed. Feel free to file another issue.

Pleae note: The development and documentation processes we have do not allow an
issue to "circle around forever as long as there is something left to change in
a certain area".

Thank you for your comprehension.
Comment 15 stefan.baltzer 2005-03-11 10:18:55 UTC
SBA: Set to verified again.
Comment 16 stefan.baltzer 2005-03-11 10:19:33 UTC
SBA: Closed.