Issue 18279 - Autocorrect of "I, some text, <return>"
Summary: Autocorrect of "I, some text, <return>"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC3
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: h.ilter
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-16 04:08 UTC by ringerc
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ringerc 2003-08-16 04:08:06 UTC
Hi

I've noticed an annoying AutoCorrect behaviour that needs fixing. It is an
incorrect automatic conversion of a block of text to a numbered list (capital
roman). To reproduce, try typing, in Writer:

I, bob smith, really dislike quirky autocorrect<return>

When you hit return/enter after the word 'autocorrect', OO.o will convert your
sentance into the first point in a list with captial roman numbering.

Expected behaviour: no autocorrect functions activated.
Actual behaviour: sentance incorrectly converted to bullet list.

This makes sense for:

I: Blah Blah Blah

or

I. Blah Blah Blah

but not, to my mind, 

I, Blah Blah Blah

I can reproduce this in OOorc{1,2,3}, OO.o 1.0.3, and all others I've tried.
Comment 1 rblackeagle 2003-08-16 15:26:27 UTC
Yes, YES Y E S !!!

This is an example of something I should have reported long ago but
left alone because it was sometimes a problem in Word and a Ctrl-Z
would fix it (sometimes).  I agree that it is quite irritating.  I use
linux as well.
Comment 2 h.ilter 2003-08-22 15:24:59 UTC
HI->OS: I've asked FT for this, he see it as a bug.
Comment 3 Oliver Specht 2003-08-26 14:09:26 UTC
.
Comment 4 Oliver Specht 2003-08-28 14:35:05 UTC
I discussed it with FT and we decided to change the following:
Up to now the following characters were allowed inside of a numbering:
. , < > ( ) 
That resulted in the error reported in this issue and also in
accepting the following combinations as numberings:

1(
1<
1>
(1)
<2> 
<2) 
and some other strange combinations. 
It has been changed to only accepting .()
Additionally the number of opening parentheses mustn't be higher than
the closing ones. 
That results in accepting combinations like:
(1)
1)
1.)
(1.)

We are certainly still able to accept more numbering levels like:
1.2.4
1.3.3.)


Comment 5 Oliver Specht 2003-09-02 08:50:23 UTC
cws os18 can be found on so-cwsserv02, wntmsci8 and unxlngi5.pro
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2003-09-02 16:44:33 UTC
Checked the numbering autoformat changes in internal CWs os18.
Comment 7 michael.ruess 2003-09-02 16:44:54 UTC
Verified. Changes will take place in OO 2.0.
Comment 8 h.ilter 2004-03-24 14:16:03 UTC
CLOSED