Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 17975
Assigning different page orientations to pages within the same doc
Last modified: 2006-05-31 21:42:15 UTC
When creating a document that contains a lot of tables, it is impossible to change the page orientation of a single page so you can display a table perpendicular to the orientation of all the other pages. It is also impossible to rotate the table so it is oriented "landscape"-wise. This is the case in M$ Word and as far as I can tell it is the case in OOo as well. I'm just a user, but I can assure you that being able to either rotate a table so it is "landscape" oriented, or being able to change a single page in a document to "landscape" orientation while all the others remain "portait" would be a very, very cool feature. BTW, the only work-around now is to turn the table (or, more often, the spreadsheet) you want to rotate into an image, and then rotate that. Needless to say, this rapidly ramps up the size of your document file.
This is done with page styles. Open the Stylist (with F11 if you can, otherwise with Format > Stylist) and click on the "Paragraph" icon if paragraph styles do not appear. I suspect you are using "Default", but whatever style you're using, right click on it and select "New" and give it a name (maybe something like "Default_Landscape") and change the orientation to "Landscape." Have the "Next style" (under the "Organizer" tab) the previous file unless you want several identical tables. Now, when you get to that place where the next page is to be a landscaped table, make it "Manual Break > Page, choose the page style and leave the pagination at "0" -- meaning, don't do anything. You have your landscaped page. Now you should be able to insert your table and it print right. However, I don't know how to do this and keep text moving around it (you might define a full-page size text frame anchored to the page to do it and insert the table in that frame). See if this works.
SBA: Reassigned to Bettina from the User Experience team for consideration.
dupe *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 7984 ***
.