Issue 1732 - liblexps638li.so component unable to be registered
Summary: liblexps638li.so component unable to be registered
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 1218
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 638
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Olaf Felka
QA Contact: issues@installation
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-09-28 21:20 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2001-09-28 21:20:00 UTC 
In the component registration phase of the installation, a popup appeared with a
message along the lines of "liblexps638li.so component unable to be
registered"... hitting Retry caused the popup to reappear, hitting Ignore caused
the popup to go away and the installation finished and claimed to be successful.

When I try to run OpenOffice, after the splash screen there is a popup which
states: An unrecoverable error has occured. All modified files have been saved
and can probably be recovered at program restart.

When I run setup and try to repair, the setup window suddenly disappears and
reports "Aborted" in the terminal window.


This is an initial attempt at installing OpenOffice on RedHat Linux 7.1.
Comment 1 khendricks 2001-10-01 19:09:23 UTC 
This is due to libstdc++ naming differences between RedHat 
and the Build Linux system.  You can use ldd in program/ to 
identify the name of libstdc++ desired by the code (and use a 
symlink to create it).

The good news is that with OO638C, a different spell checker is 
used so this problem will no longer happen.

This should be closed as fixed under OO638C
Comment 2 Olaf Felka 2001-10-02 15:19:08 UTC 
This was reported before.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 1218 ***
Comment 3 Olaf Felka 2001-10-02 15:19:31 UTC 
Dublicate