Issue 16677 - 11rc: io patch to conditionalize static data member junk
Summary: 11rc: io patch to conditionalize static data member junk
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: porting
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC
Hardware: Mac Mac OS X, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 RC
Assignee: fa
QA Contact: issues@porting
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 16413 17274
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-07-10 17:40 UTC by fa
Modified: 2004-02-15 07:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
cd to io, patch -p0 < /path/to/patchfile (3.62 KB, patch)
2003-07-10 17:40 UTC, fa 		no flags Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description fa 2003-07-10 17:40:02 UTC 
Make sure the gcc 2.95 static data member hacks don't get compiled for gcc 3.3
Comment 1 fa 2003-07-10 17:40:39 UTC 
Created attachment 7542 [details]
cd to io, patch -p0 < /path/to/patchfile
Comment 2 khendricks 2003-07-10 19:06:39 UTC 
Hi,
Completely MacOSX specific so approved for commit to OOo 1.1

This is another patch that I hope once gcc 3.3 proves it will work that 
we could remove the whole need for ifdefs completely.

Kevin
Comment 3 fa 2003-07-14 15:48:44 UTC 
committed to cws_srx645_ooo11rc2
Comment 4 fa 2003-07-23 00:13:35 UTC 
Patch still applies to cws_srx645_ooo11rc3.  Re-opening and assigning to ooo11rc3 
tracking issue.  Will close as fixed once io get integrated to HEAD/ooo11rc3.
Comment 5 Martin Hollmichel 2003-07-23 16:59:29 UTC 
set target milestone to 1.1.1 as no neccassarly have to go into rc, but can.
just to keep rc target small. this does not mean we have to wait until 1.1.1,
maybe we've to open a new target for those issues. dan, can you handle similar
issues also in that way ?
now gone to holiday.
Comment 6 fa 2003-07-31 16:49:14 UTC 
Committed to cws_srx645_ooo11rc3
Comment 7 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-15 07:28:29 UTC 
verfied in 1.1.0.
Comment 8 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-15 07:31:38 UTC 
close issue