Issue 16140 - Font ariblk.ttf may not be written to <drive>:\winnt\fonts during workstation installation
Summary: Font ariblk.ttf may not be written to <drive>:\winnt\fonts during workstation...
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 RC
Assignee: joerg.skottke
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-27 09:37 UTC by joerg.skottke
Modified: 2003-07-01 07:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joerg.skottke 2003-06-27 09:37:25 UTC 
For some reason the setup tries to write the font ariblk.ttf to the Windows
fonts-directory during workstation installation (from /net install) 
This happens in Terminal Server and Citrix environments,

This has been solved for all other fonts some time ago, i think it is broken.
Comment 1 joerg.skottke 2003-06-27 10:12:28 UTC 
retarget.
Comment 2 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2003-06-27 16:13:58 UTC 
This bug is not quite clear for two reasons:

1. OpenOffice.org does not contain the ariblk.ttf. Do you mean a
StarOffice?

2. Of course all fonts are installed into the Windows font directory
during the user intallation. In the network intallation all fonts are
copied to /share/fonts/truetype
Comment 3 joerg.skottke 2003-06-30 08:25:47 UTC 
1. Correct, StarOffice only
2. This has been fixed for the other fonts some time ago, why is this
one different? You cannot write to /share/fonts/truetype as normal
user iirc.
I can provide a testing environment that shows the issue.
Comment 4 dirk.voelzke 2003-06-30 13:10:13 UTC 
The overwrite warning is correct here.
Comment 5 dirk.voelzke 2003-06-30 13:12:09 UTC 
.
Comment 6 joerg.skottke 2003-07-01 07:00:28 UTC 
Invalidating issue. Even if this is "ugly" there is nothing we can do
here.
Comment 7 joerg.skottke 2003-07-01 07:53:01 UTC 
close