Issue 15813 - View->Inactive menu items pref should just go away
Summary: View->Inactive menu items pref should just go away
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: ui
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/def...
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-19 13:33 UTC by ralphie
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ralphie 2003-06-19 13:33:47 UTC
This is maybe the most useless preference in the whole of OpenOffice.org:

in Options->OpenOffice.org>View there is a checkbox for "inactive menu items".

This is completely useless. Why?

Because *none* of the Human Interface Guidelines in existance on any
platform OO runs on suggests hiding menu items.

Just as an example the text from Windows HIG (URL in issue):
/-
|In general, it is better to disable a menu item rather than remove it because
|his provides more stability in the interface. However, if the context is such
|that the menu item is no longer or never relevant, remove it. For example, if a
|menu displays a set of open files and one of those files is closed or DEL eted,
|it is appropriate to remove the corresponding menu item.
\-

The UI Guidelines of GNOME, KDE and Aqua are much stronger in their wording,
not even suggesting that removing menu items should be a valid solution
ever.

Even though removing this one pref might be a drop in the ocean, I think
it should be policy to at least apply "common denominator" UI fixes that
improve the user experience *on all 4 plattforms*.

Removing unnecessary prefs is an important step to making the necessary
ones more usable.

/ralph
Comment 1 rbywater 2003-10-28 07:59:19 UTC
Not sure if this is a defect as such as the system is working as
designed...  Therefore changing to enhancement as I *think* thats
where it should be - someone feel free to change it to something else :)

Confirming so that this issue can move on to the necessary parties.
Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2003-10-28 17:35:23 UTC
SBA: Reassigned to Bettina.
Comment 3 ace_dent 2008-05-16 02:41:43 UTC
OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker - Feedback Request.

The Issue you raised has the status 'New' pending further action, but has not
been updated within the last 4 years. Please consider re-testing with one of the
latest versions of OOo, as the problem(s) may have already been addressed.
Either use the recent stable version: http://download.openoffice.org/index.html
or consider trying the new OOo 3 BETA (still in testing):
http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/
 
Please report back the outcome so this Issue may be Closed or Progressed as
necessary - otherwise it may be Resolved as Invalid in the future. You may also
wish to search for (and note) any duplicates of this Issue that may have
advanced further by checking the Issue Tracker:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/query.cgi
 
Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues as part of:
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html
Comment 4 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 15:17:08 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements".