Issue 15578 - OOo crashes when attempting to format a cell
Summary: OOo crashes when attempting to format a cell
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 10210
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: oc
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-13 08:15 UTC by charpen2
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description charpen2 2003-06-13 08:15:43 UTC 
When working on a very simple speadsheet (some numbers, some multiplications and
additions), trying to reach the "Format cell" dialog box through the "Format
menu", Cell" item, caused  OOo (1.1beta2) to crash on me. This appeared in the
terminal windows from which I launched OOo :
 /opt/OpenOffice.org1.1Beta/program/soffice.bin: relocation error:
/opt/OpenOffice.org1.1Beta/program/libsvx644li.so: symbol
_ZNK19SvxAlignmentTabPage13GetUniqueItemERK10SfxItemSett, version UDK_3_0_0 not
defined in file libsal.so.3 with link time reference

Setup : Debian GNU/Linux (mostly "stable" (Woody, a. k. a. 3.0) but with some
"unstable" (Sid) components), running on AMD Athlon 1 Ghz, 512 Mb RAM ; Xfree
4.2.0 as packaged in Debian unstable.
Comment 1 dankegel 2003-06-15 20:20:33 UTC 
Where did you install OOo1.1beta2?  Is it possible
it's picking up libsal.so from an old OpenOffice?

An example spreadsheet and explicit recipe would be helpful.

(Also, it'd be great if you could send a crash log.
See http://kegel.com/openoffice/#dump
Don't worry about it if this is too hard to figure out.)
Comment 2 peter.junge 2003-06-16 13:13:37 UTC 
Hi Emmanuel,

you added a similar comment quite a while ago to issue #10210. Could
it be that you're still using the glibc 2.3.1?

Best regards, Peter
Comment 3 dankegel 2003-06-21 06:21:28 UTC 
OK, this is almost certainly a dupe of issue 10210, curable by
upgrading to glibc-2.3.2.  Sorry I didn't see that first time around.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 10210 ***
Comment 4 oc 2003-07-22 14:47:44 UTC 
Closed because duplicate