Issue 14104 - OpenOffice is very slow (essentially, useless) in a highly loaded PC
Summary: OpenOffice is very slow (essentially, useless) in a highly loaded PC
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 9277
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P1 (highest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: matthias.huetsch
QA Contact: issues@gsl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-05 09:46 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-05-06 20:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-05-05 09:46:07 UTC
Open Office has always had this defect: when the processor is loaded, it runs
slow. But with the new OS that I have installed (SuSE Linux 8.2), and with
versions of OpenOffice 1.0.2 from 1.1.Beta, this becomes unacceptable. When a
program occupies 85-97% of the CPU (no matter what  % of memory), the OpenOffice
is extremely slow and, generally, unusable. 

I wonder whether there is a solution. The problem seems to become more and more
serious as the OS-s and gcc versions progress. 

Other similar applications, like koffice, Netscape do not display noticeable
slowdown.
Comment 1 ooo 2003-05-06 08:52:10 UTC
this is not an API issue. 
Comment 2 stx123 2003-05-06 09:11:16 UTC
Matthias, would you like to take care of this issue?
Comment 3 matthias.huetsch 2003-05-06 20:24:14 UTC
After upgrading my SuSE 8.1 to SuSE 8.2, I can only confirm this issue.
And yes, it is indeed bad with even repaints delayed for more than a
minute.

Thanks for reporting this, even if it is duplicate to issue 9277. I will
add this description to issue 9277, and take care that it will be fixed
for OOo 1.1 at least.
Comment 4 matthias.huetsch 2003-05-06 20:36:34 UTC
Resolving as duplicate to issue 9277. If you like to further track this,
you might add yourself to the CC list of that issue.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 9277 ***
Comment 5 matthias.huetsch 2003-05-06 20:38:08 UTC
Closing...