Issue 13793 - Some values for writing aids options are ignored
Summary: Some values for writing aids options are ignored
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 15362
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-24 23:05 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-04-24 23:05:47 UTC 
Values for available language modules (Writing aids options) are ignored from
one invocation of the Options dialog box to another.
Comment 1 khendricks 2003-04-24 23:26:34 UTC 
Hi, 
 
Unfortunately these options are not under the control of lingucomponent project.. 
Please change this to the sw (wordprocessor) project in the hopes they know where 
these options are being (or should be stored). 
 
Kevin
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-04-24 23:42:20 UTC 
Changing to the word processor component.

BTW, "Check in all languages" option is also not persisted. Who knows
what esle is not saved! I haven't tested all of them. Changing summary
to reflect that.
Comment 3 Unknown 2003-04-24 23:44:42 UTC 
Reassigning issue to owner of word processor component.
Comment 4 h.ilter 2003-04-28 10:49:44 UTC 
Reassigned to MRU
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2003-05-20 14:27:42 UTC 
This looks like a tomporarily problem which encountered the 644m11
snapshot. In OO 1.1 Beta2 this should work again.
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2003-05-22 09:36:01 UTC 
Closed. Works with OO 1.1 Beta2.
Comment 7 Unknown 2003-07-01 10:15:58 UTC 
Reopening as "Check in all languages" and AutoCheck options are not
persisted in beta 2. BTW, have they been designed to be persisted?
Comment 8 michael.ruess 2003-07-04 15:05:42 UTC 
This problem is handled in issue #15362.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 15362 ***
Comment 9 michael.ruess 2003-07-04 15:06:41 UTC 
CLosed as duplicate.