Issue 13223 - list order of available scripts, confusing
Summary: list order of available scripts, confusing
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: scripting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta
Hardware: Sun All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: noel.power
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-09 16:38 UTC by robert.kinsella
Modified: 2005-03-31 15:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description robert.kinsella 2003-04-09 16:38:13 UTC 
SframeworkInstall.jar ed-0.2 rc4

After compiling and deploying 12 scripts (in the same parcel) to Scripts/share,
the order in which they appear in the assign script to menu/key/events dialog
lists is confusing.
The parcel-descriptor.xml file has the scripts listed in alphbetical order, they
do not appear in alphabetical order in the dialog lists.

Further, if one deploys, say 4 more scripts in a different parcel they scripts
are intermixed with the previously deployed scripts in the first parcel. Not a
problem if there are only a few scripts, but ideally the scripts should be
listed in alphbetical order
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-04-22 07:40:17 UTC 
Assign to Noel - comes under general problem of script containment.
Need to have some concept of physical container and have options as to
how scripts are listed in this container - alphabetical or in order
created and listed in parcel-descriptor.xml. Is this another
deployment property that needs added?
Comment 2 noel.power 2003-06-08 13:28:48 UTC 
started
Comment 3 noel.power 2004-01-07 09:54:01 UTC 
the essential issue in this bug is the format of the scripts to be displayed
needs to be decided. For 2.0 the Tools/Configure dialog set is being redesigned.
Moving the relevant text for this bug to 21879 which is the issue for the
redesigning of this dialog set.
Comment 4 Mathias_Bauer 2005-03-31 15:34:38 UTC 
Only a closed issue is a good issue. :-)