Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 13126
AT tool (ZoomText): Edit fields are not read
Last modified: 2004-02-10 13:33:17 UTC
If an edit field gets the focus, ZoomText neither reads the accessible name nor the accessible text of the edit field. Only when caret reading is enabled and the position of the caret changes, ZoomText reads the accessible text of the edit field (e.g. caret at the end of text, then move the caret one position to the left). Note: though the priority can't be higher than P3 (no crash and so on...) this issue means that ZoomText won't read about 40-60% of the OOo UI.
adding myself to CC because this also means that ZoomText doesn't read one of the main controls in the DBA area (table view in the data source browser)
MT->ES: Seems to be fixed with ZT8.02, please verify.
Yes it's fixed!
closed
i cannot approve that - for example in control property browser or form property browser neither the content nor the label is read in edit fields, as ES has acknowledged - in combo and list boxes the label is not read so i reopen this task
clu->mt: sorry, your turn again
MT->CGU: Please distinguish between pure edit fields in dialogs and combinded controls...
ES->CLU: and I also would distinguish between edit fields in dialogs and toolbar an edit fields in floatings (I think those last only have this problem). I'd like to keep this issue closed and open a new one. ->MT: what do you think?
CLU->MT: i think you have mistaken my member code (cgu<->clu) and speak to me: (MT->CGU: Please distinguish between pure edit fields in dialogs and combinded controls...) -> how should i do that? - is there a difference visuable or anything else i could distinguish - for me they look equal? CLU->ES: seems that the fields i mean, are not 'real' edit fields, but anything combined - writing a new issue seems not necessary, because the old ones were closed double to this here (therfore i reopend this issue) and i will reopen them
CLU->ES: i reopend task 104888 and 104887 - both were closed as double to 102189 - this bug is fixed not fully, because the two, i have reopend, are not fixed - this task (102189) was mirrored in the current (i13126) task
ES->CLU: as discussed. We'll keep your bug 104888 open. This one is to general zo correspond to the present problem.