Issue 126777 - Web site update for WHY -> "Office 2003 EOL"
Summary: Web site update for WHY -> "Office 2003 EOL"
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P5 (lowest) Minor (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-01-07 10:40 UTC by Jan Høydahl
Modified: 2017-05-20 09:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Jan Høydahl 2016-01-07 10:40:19 UTC
The page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_office2003-end-of-life.html is out of date as it says "Microsoft has announced that they are ending support of Office 2003 and Windows XP on April 8th, 2014"...

Since we do not manage to keep such time-sensitive information up to date, let's either rewrite it into a general "No more EOL" page discussing the general problem of needing to upgrade at EOL, or get rid of the page alltogether.

Now that Office 365 is getting more popular, perhaps it would be cool with a page showing the true accumulated cost of subscribing to Office365 over a period of, say, 5 years...?
Comment 1 oooforum (fr) 2016-01-08 14:52:26 UTC
(In reply to Jan Høydahl from comment #0)
> The page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_office2003-end-of-life.html is
> out of date 
Yes but, this page can be accessed from http://www.openoffice.org/why/

> Now that Office 365 is getting more popular, perhaps it would be cool with a
> page showing the true accumulated cost of subscribing to Office365 over a
> period of, say, 5 years...?
Nice idea
You could write this page and attach it here.
Once done, we'll update on website.
Comment 2 orcmid 2016-01-08 15:41:11 UTC
This is an inappropriate procedure for staging contributions into Apache OpenOffice content.

The originators must manage to make the contribution themselves.  If it is substantial, a CLA may be requested.  Working second- and third-hand is not acceptable.  That applies to a couple of other recently-opened bugzilla issues also.

Project committers will ultimately determine the acceptability and form for incorporation of such contributions into project content.

 - - - - - - - - - - -

There is a policy issue about "Why?" in any case.  

The Apache Project is not an advocacy organization nor is it engaged in competitive activity.  Those are not in the spirit of the Apache Software Foundation's commitment to production of software as a freely available public good.   It is not the purpose of AOO or any Apache Project to disparage or assess the work or products of others.  The purpose of the project is to do good work and make it available to the public. 

To discuss this further, please comment on the dev@openoffice.apache.org list.  The bugzilla is not the place for this conversation, which is about a serious policy matter.
Comment 3 Andrea Pescetti 2016-01-09 23:06:21 UTC
Resolving, setting NOT_AN_ISSUE not to deny the issue but to remark that the current discussion is happening on the mailing list and not in this issue.